"Vass" <markDEL@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Joel" <Joel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:e0vuv3lufbncefnaavn39ebqmspkncncbg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > It seems like the original get kill-filed because of the "xxx" string
in
> > email, so I don't have the original.
>
> changed that now.
Yup! I am be able to read your message now.
> > ISO - in general, ISO=100 in low light silutation is usually a BIG NO
NO
> > GO.
> >
>
> ah, there we go then, I was on the right lines
And some digital camera is better with higher-ISO (less noise) than
other,
or Canon DSLR usually can handle low-light or high-ISO much better than
Nikon, and the newest Nikon D300 seems to handle low-light better than her
older cousins.
> ta
|
