Re: High speed camera vs. HD video

"AKA gray asphalt" <benvhoff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:xXsOj.167785$nr1.119043@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Burgerman" <burgerman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:uuaOj.50167$Ff4.16383@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Yes. Its a point and shoot! Noisy, low image quality, does not compare
to 
>> a real Digital SLR. Great for snaps. Unusable for printing high quality

>> 20x30 prints unless you are very easily pleased!
>
> That's not what the reviews say. You obviously
> haven't used one. They haven't even been
> available until last week in the US. So I know you
> are bsing. Who wants 20x30 prints for wedding
> photos?
>
>
>
Not many of my past wedding customers wanted 2030 wall prints, except for 
the really upscale ones, but a 16x20, matted and framed of the bride and 
groom was purchased about 90% of the time. In many cases, three were 
purchased (I gave a discount for that), one for the couple and one for
each 
parent. I suspect tht I would have solf far fewer of them if I hadn't been

shooting 6x7 negatives.