"JJ" <kebahtphjn@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:SyYSj.6792$815.5223@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Ken Hart" <kwhart1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:OtQSj.372$ch1.165@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Slak" <kclinton@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:ffcd137b-ee5e-4f82-93d9-cd433403cbe0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On May 1, 3:26 pm, "JJ" <kebahtp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> I have a problem with bracketing on both of my cameras, Canon EOS 10D
>>> and
>>> EOS 300D.
>>> I am new to this area of photography and might be doing something
wrong,
>>> but
>>> what?
>>> I want the camera take 3 shots of the same scene with 3 different
>>> exposures,
>>> but I presumed I'd only have to press the shutter release button
>>> once...'to
>>> get the 3 shots. Instead, I get only 1 shot. Do I have to press the
>>> shutter
>>> button 3 times to get the 3 exposures? I thought bracketing meant the
>>> camera
>>> would do it?
>>>
>>> I have used WB Bracketing and hade 3 different white balance shots
from
>>> only
>>> 1 press of the shutter button, so is AE bracketing different, in
>>> requiring 3
>>> seperate shots? Or am I simply getting it all wrong?
>>>
>>> Any assistance appreciated.
>>>
>>> J
>>
>> How about setting the drive mode to continuous, and just hold the
>> shutter release for 3 shots?
>> click...click...click .... all done, nice && easy.
>>
>> Cheers . . .
>> --
>> kc
>>
>> Here's a really crazy idea: instead of depending on a bunch of fancy
>> doodads and gizmos, why not try this when you want to bracket (I do it
>> this way all the time!)?
>> Set the exposure, take a picture. Adjust the exposure one or two stops
in
>> one direction, take a picture. Adjust the exposure one or two stops in
>> the other direction, take a picture.
>> Machines, such as the Canon EOS 10 or 30D, or even the slightly older
>> Canon FX (manufactured 1964-1968) are simply tools. They have no
>> intelligence of their own. The results depend on the decision-making
>> skill of the user.
>>
>
> Talk about 'flying off at tangents'!Nobody suggested that cameras did
have
> any intelligence of their own, so why are you implying that they did?
Your
> 'method' is old-school and tedious and time-consuming, but modern
cameras
> allow us to be more productive in less time. Using continuous drive mode
> in conjunction with bracketing is a grea idea, and nothing to do with
the
> camera being intelligent, only the photographer, it seems 'you' have to
be
> reminded of this yourself as you are the only one talking about
it....'or
> did you reply to the wrong thread again? :)
>
> J
If you are using a tripod then the continous shutter setting can introduce
vibration and loss of sharpness in the pictures.
It would be best to use the mirror up option as well, although this would
mean you press the shutter 6 times for 3 exposures (1st press lifts the
mirror up, 2nd press takes the picture) this only tends to work on
subjects
that don't move much such as buildings and landscapes.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com
**
|
