Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Photography...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 38 of 71 Topic 11561 of 11580
Post > Topic >>

Re: Photography and the Law

by Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 8, 2008 at 11:08 PM

On Thu, 8 May 2008 22:26:02 +0100, Les Invalides <Les@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> posted
>>
>>When faced with making a decision, most people will make a decision
>>that they believe is least likely to result in negative consequences
>>for themselves.  Prohibiting an activity is usually less likely to
>>rebound than saying "yes".
>
>I remember many years ago, during a warm spell like this one, suggesting 
>to my wife that we get one of those portable disposable tinfoil 
>barbecues and take it down to the park for a picnic with the kids. She 
>said, "I think you'd better find out first if it's allowed." So I rang 
>the council's Parks & Recs  department and asked. There was an audible 
>gasp at the other end: "Barbecue? Park? Children? My God! Absolutely 
>not! Can't possibly be permitted! Don't you realise what could happen?".
>
>So we took sandwiches instead. A week or two later we were down at the 
>park again, and I happened to see a family with a disposable barbecue 
>doing just what I had wanted to do, and having a great time. Just for 
>fun I rang the council and said I had seen some people having a barbecue 
>in the park and whether anything should be done about it. The reply, of 
>course, was: "Barbecue? Park? Children? Sorry sir. Nothing we can do 
>about it. None of our business."

I really don't know why the average Englishman feels that they have to
find someone to ask permission to carry out any activity that they
believe might be in the slightest unusual.

Not that it's only people in the UK.  An American yachtsman I once met
spent an entire day on a small uninhabited island trying to find
someone to show his passport to.  He finally persuaded a bewildered
visiting fisherman to give him permission to stay the night.

-- 
Cynic




 71 Posts in Topic:
Photography and the Law
"Marcus Fox" &l  2008-05-08 16:59:25 
Re: Photography and the Law
"MC" <qwert@  2008-05-08 17:19:17 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Marcus Fox" &l  2008-05-08 17:39:39 
Re: Photography and the Law
"MC" <qwert@  2008-05-08 19:14:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 20:22:12 
Re: Photography and the Law
Palindrome <me9@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 19:38:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 22:58:10 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Jethro" <je  2008-05-09 09:50:20 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-09 12:14:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 14:15:48 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 10:09:14 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 13:12:58 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 14:39:15 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 15:48:30 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 20:34:40 
Re: Photography and the Law
Carole <TheNewCarole@[  2008-05-09 11:57:48 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 18:50:21 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 20:39:13 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 15:39:44 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 20:56:23 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-10 01:10:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-10 13:41:40 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-10 16:58:27 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-10 21:58:00 
Re: Photography and the Law
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-10 20:15:55 
Re: Photography and the Law
"PDM" <pdcm9  2008-05-10 08:39:20 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-08 18:09:40 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 13:47:15 
Re: Photography and the Law
"MC" <qwert@  2008-05-08 18:58:21 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 19:29:18 
Re: Photography and the Law
stillnobodyhome@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 20:08:49 
Re: Photography and the Law
Stuart B <stillnobodyh  2008-05-08 20:34:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Pete D" <no  2008-05-09 06:45:27 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 23:29:33 
Re: Photography and the Law
Usenet Police <ChurchL  2008-05-08 20:49:41 
Re: Photography and the Law
Jonathan Bryce <jonath  2008-05-09 01:01:00 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-08 22:26:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 23:08:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 07:12:06 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-09 08:18:38 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 08:38:27 
Re: Photography and the Law
"The One" <s  2008-05-09 09:41:48 
Re: Photography and the Law
guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 09:13:22 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 10:25:47 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 10:29:20 
Re: Photography and the Law
"The One" <s  2008-05-09 12:20:00 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-09 15:48:54 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 11:02:52 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-09 16:51:29 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 09:31:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-09 10:46:54 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Ken Hart" <  2008-05-09 13:03:46 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 13:06:31 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 14:49:49 
Re: Photography and the Law
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 07:02:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 16:56:56 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 12:41:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 09:15:26 
Re: Photography and the Law
Graham Murray <newspos  2008-05-09 17:32:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 21:05:15 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 21:06:59 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 21:17:58 
Re: Photography and the Law
Graham Murray <newspos  2008-05-10 08:38:10 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-10 09:13:47 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-10 13:52:13 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-10 20:04:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 11:50:47 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-11 13:14:23 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 11:54:19 
Re: Photography and the Law
guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 21:54:22 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 11:57:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu May 15 22:23:48 CDT 2008.