Re: Photography and the Law

In message <-PWdnWZCStLUjbnVnZ2dnUVZ8qXinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Jethro 
<jethro_uk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes
>"Cynic" <cynic_999@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:3vj624ljfov3c6dcdqesb6bnifuc2mbru0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:14:02 +0100, "MC" <qwert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>You can "snap away" until said patrons complain to the proprietor who
may
>>>tell the photographer to stop.  It is also possible the proprietor
could
>>>even offer the complainer the option to leave the premises if they do
not
>>>like the chance of ending up in a photo.  Best thing is to approach the
>>>proprietor and ask permission.  They may give permission with strings 
>>>(i.e.
>>>no people photos) of they may just let you get on with whatever you
want.
>>>Best to ask all the same.
>>
>> I disagree.  If something is not expressly forbidden, then IMO it is
>> *never* a good idea to ask for permission.
>
>'tis easier to ask forgiveness than permission !

*Mostly* but not always tis easier to ask forgiveness than permission...

-- 
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills  Staffs  England     /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/