Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Photography > Re: Photography...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 21 of 71 Topic 11561 of 11580
Post > Topic >>

Re: Photography and the Law

by krishnananda <k@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 10, 2008 at 01:10 AM

In article <3pr9241dqqr7ia6ftpet70eifaerrg7vh0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
 Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> Which apply (as the rules you posted pointed out) to "Every motorist and
> pedestrian using any facility under the jurisdiction and control of the
> Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority"
> 
> I reiterate that it's perfectly legal to photograph any bridges or
tunnels
> provided you do so from land that is NOT owned by the authority. If
you're not
> on their land, or 'using their facility' they have no power over you.

True. However you also snipped a statement from an NYPD spokesman saying 
that while photographing on the subway remains legal (it was never 
illegal), photographing the Triboro, Queensboro, or Manhattan bridges is 
"illegal". I have no idea whether there is any truth to this, but if it 
is NYPD policy it might as well be law as far as the hassle factor is 
concerned.

A friend of mine is documenting Newtown Creek. He regularly gets a free 
cup of coffee from various Queens police precinct houses when he is 
hauled in for taking pictures _of_ the Queens-Midtown Tunnel, the 
Newtown Creek power plant, the Sunnyside rail yards, even the elevated N 
train. The fact that it is not necessarily illegal doesn't seem to 
matter in these days of "if you are taking pictures you must be a 
terrorist". He has yet to be charged and has a very convincing 
ACLU-inspired patter that is usually all he needs.

He has some pretty interesting HDR images of the area at:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mitchwaxman/

> 
> >In fact I was arrested for one shot of the exterior of the building
with 
> >a digital p/s, requested to delete the photo, and released with no 
> >charges. The OCME has an extensive outdoors facility, in a tent and 
> >quite a few trailers, where the DNA testing of 9/11 remains is going
on. 
> 
> Where is this facility? Is it the place on 1st Ave., next to NYU?

Yes, the blue tile building on the corner of 1st Ave. and E 30th St. 
Spread out from there across E 30th to the oldest Bellevue buildings is 
the tent city. Between 1st and the FDR Drive access road are the stacked 
trailer/morgues and a new much bigger tent. There is a constant police 
presence and E 30th street is closed to traffic for the foreseeable 
future.

As long as mindless hysteria rules the actual letter of the law has very 
little meaning.




 71 Posts in Topic:
Photography and the Law
"Marcus Fox" &l  2008-05-08 16:59:25 
Re: Photography and the Law
"MC" <qwert@  2008-05-08 17:19:17 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Marcus Fox" &l  2008-05-08 17:39:39 
Re: Photography and the Law
"MC" <qwert@  2008-05-08 19:14:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 20:22:12 
Re: Photography and the Law
Palindrome <me9@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 19:38:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 22:58:10 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Jethro" <je  2008-05-09 09:50:20 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-09 12:14:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 14:15:48 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 10:09:14 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 13:12:58 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 14:39:15 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 15:48:30 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 20:34:40 
Re: Photography and the Law
Carole <TheNewCarole@[  2008-05-09 11:57:48 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 18:50:21 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 20:39:13 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 15:39:44 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 20:56:23 
Re: Photography and the Law
krishnananda <k@[EMAIL  2008-05-10 01:10:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-10 13:41:40 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-10 16:58:27 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-10 21:58:00 
Re: Photography and the Law
Paul Furman <paul-@[EM  2008-05-10 20:15:55 
Re: Photography and the Law
"PDM" <pdcm9  2008-05-10 08:39:20 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-08 18:09:40 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 13:47:15 
Re: Photography and the Law
"MC" <qwert@  2008-05-08 18:58:21 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 19:29:18 
Re: Photography and the Law
stillnobodyhome@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-08 20:08:49 
Re: Photography and the Law
Stuart B <stillnobodyh  2008-05-08 20:34:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Pete D" <no  2008-05-09 06:45:27 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 23:29:33 
Re: Photography and the Law
Usenet Police <ChurchL  2008-05-08 20:49:41 
Re: Photography and the Law
Jonathan Bryce <jonath  2008-05-09 01:01:00 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-08 22:26:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-08 23:08:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 07:12:06 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-09 08:18:38 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 08:38:27 
Re: Photography and the Law
"The One" <s  2008-05-09 09:41:48 
Re: Photography and the Law
guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 09:13:22 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 10:25:47 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 10:29:20 
Re: Photography and the Law
"The One" <s  2008-05-09 12:20:00 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-09 15:48:54 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 11:02:52 
Re: Photography and the Law
Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI  2008-05-09 16:51:29 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 09:31:02 
Re: Photography and the Law
Les Invalides <Les@[EM  2008-05-09 10:46:54 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Ken Hart" <  2008-05-09 13:03:46 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 13:06:31 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 14:49:49 
Re: Photography and the Law
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 07:02:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 16:56:56 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-09 12:41:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 09:15:26 
Re: Photography and the Law
Graham Murray <newspos  2008-05-09 17:32:04 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 21:05:15 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 21:06:59 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-09 21:17:58 
Re: Photography and the Law
Graham Murray <newspos  2008-05-10 08:38:10 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-10 09:13:47 
Re: Photography and the Law
"Peter" <pet  2008-05-10 13:52:13 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-10 20:04:42 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 11:50:47 
Re: Photography and the Law
Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL  2008-05-11 13:14:23 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 11:54:19 
Re: Photography and the Law
guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-11 21:54:22 
Re: Photography and the Law
Chris H <chris@[EMAIL   2008-05-11 11:57:22 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu May 15 23:12:02 CDT 2008.