Photography > Photography > Re: Photography...

Latest [ Topics | Posts ]

Re: Photography and the Law

by Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 10, 2008 at 04:58 PM

On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:41:40 -0400, "Peter" <peternew@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>"Mike Ross" <mike@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>news:3pr9241dqqr7ia6ftpet70eifaerrg7vh0@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Which apply (as the rules you posted pointed out) to "Every motorist
and
>> pedestrian using any facility under the jurisdiction and control of the
>> Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority"

>Which jurisdictional laws are you writing about?

Sorry, we've drifted a little and are discussing New York.

Mike
--
http://www.corestore.org
'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'

71 Posts in Topic:

Photography and the Law

"Marcus Fox" &l

2008-05-08 16:59:25

Re: Photography and the Law

"MC" <qwert@

2008-05-08 17:19:17

Re: Photography and the Law

"Marcus Fox" &l

2008-05-08 17:39:39

Re: Photography and the Law

"MC" <qwert@

2008-05-08 19:14:02

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-08 20:22:12

Re: Photography and the Law

Palindrome <me9@[EMAIL

2008-05-08 19:38:04

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-08 22:58:10

Re: Photography and the Law

"Jethro" <je

2008-05-09 09:50:20

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-09 12:14:02

Re: Photography and the Law

krishnananda <k@[EMAIL

2008-05-08 14:15:48

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-09 10:09:14

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 13:12:58

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-09 14:39:15

Re: Photography and the Law

krishnananda <k@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 15:48:30

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 20:34:40

Re: Photography and the Law

Carole <TheNewCarole@[

2008-05-09 11:57:48

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-09 18:50:21

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 20:39:13

Re: Photography and the Law

krishnananda <k@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 15:39:44

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 20:56:23

Re: Photography and the Law

krishnananda <k@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 01:10:42

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-10 13:41:40

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 16:58:27

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-10 21:58:00

Re: Photography and the Law

Paul Furman <paul-@[EM

2008-05-10 20:15:55

Re: Photography and the Law

"PDM" <pdcm9

2008-05-10 08:39:20

Re: Photography and the Law

Les Invalides <Les@[EM

2008-05-08 18:09:40

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-08 13:47:15

Re: Photography and the Law

"MC" <qwert@

2008-05-08 18:58:21

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-08 19:29:18

Re: Photography and the Law

stillnobodyhome@[EMAIL PR

2008-05-08 20:08:49

Re: Photography and the Law

Stuart B <stillnobodyh

2008-05-08 20:34:42

Re: Photography and the Law

"Pete D" <no

2008-05-09 06:45:27

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-08 23:29:33

Re: Photography and the Law

Usenet Police <ChurchL

2008-05-08 20:49:41

Re: Photography and the Law

Jonathan Bryce <jonath

2008-05-09 01:01:00

Re: Photography and the Law

Les Invalides <Les@[EM

2008-05-08 22:26:02

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-08 23:08:04

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 07:12:06

Re: Photography and the Law

Les Invalides <Les@[EM

2008-05-09 08:18:38

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 08:38:27

Re: Photography and the Law

"The One" <s

2008-05-09 09:41:48

Re: Photography and the Law

guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT

2008-05-11 09:13:22

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 10:25:47

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 10:29:20

Re: Photography and the Law

"The One" <s

2008-05-09 12:20:00

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-09 15:48:54

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-09 11:02:52

Re: Photography and the Law

Cynic <cynic_999@[EMAI

2008-05-09 16:51:29

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 09:31:02

Re: Photography and the Law

Les Invalides <Les@[EM

2008-05-09 10:46:54

Re: Photography and the Law

"Ken Hart" <

2008-05-09 13:03:46

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 13:06:31

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 14:49:49

Re: Photography and the Law

floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-05-09 07:02:42

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 16:56:56

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-09 12:41:04

Re: Photography and the Law

guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT

2008-05-11 09:15:26

Re: Photography and the Law

Graham Murray <newspos

2008-05-09 17:32:04

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 21:05:15

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 21:06:59

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-09 21:17:58

Re: Photography and the Law

Graham Murray <newspos

2008-05-10 08:38:10

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 09:13:47

Re: Photography and the Law

"Peter" <pet

2008-05-10 13:52:13

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-10 20:04:42

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-11 11:50:47

Re: Photography and the Law

Mike Ross <mike@[EMAIL

2008-05-11 13:14:23

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-11 11:54:19

Re: Photography and the Law

guig <guig@[EMAIL PROT

2008-05-11 21:54:22

Re: Photography and the Law

Chris H <chris@[EMAIL

2008-05-11 11:57:22

Post A Reply:

About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
tan12V112 Thu May 15 23:21:10 CDT 2008.