Re: Stepping out a panorama (the method that can't be done!)

... wrote:
> Recently I suggested to a poster about to launch into "panoramas" that
he 
> may be better off walking and snapping shots to stich than the recent
method 
> of using a rotating head on a tripod to harvest the images to work with.

> I've owned fixed and swing lens panorama camera so the advise came from 
> experience... Unlike the replies!
> 
> Atheist Chaplain 


ATTACK #1

(amongst other) took the op****tunity to get in a bit of
> head kicking for even suggesting the process I've been using for 30
years 
> could work!
> 
> The interesting part of this is that when an idiot uses an oxymoron for
a 
> name, trying to conceal his identity, he very clearly must have a reason
for 
> doing so. The reason is never more clear than when he attacks a working 
> professional and the Pro produces evidence he is not just wrong but a 
> pedantic fool as well!
> 
> It's sort of like when that Childs puppet Charles Stevens 

ATTACK #2

(calling himself
> Mark Thomas the 7th) posted a heap of lies and defamation about me
because I 
> posted some relevant information about the need to have a "commercial 
> Photography Permit" when you take pictures in National Parks if you
intend 
> to sell the photos.
> 
> He claimed then that I'd posted a load of bull****. Claiming also the
EPA 
> didn't issue the permits, I was a liar. 

I think this little gem from last week proves that

"Incidentally, anyone who now cries fowl (foul) about me "name changing
to escape their "kill file" needs to recognize even the most basic
newsreader filters on E-mail addresses and mine is unchanged in nearly
6 months."

Yep. One of us certainly was. and it
> wasn't me!
> 
> And then because of his inability to read the written word, he tried the

> "you're full of bull****" trick again when I wrote about one of my 
> shopfronts. "Liar" the idiot cried. Again one of us certainly was... The

> scan of the permit and a photo of my cor****ate office (a shopfront)
proved 
> him to be the liar.
> 
> Did that stop him? Nah... Weak minded morons like him and the wanker
calling 
> himself "Atheist Chaplain" all seem to be so smart that if they can't 
> understand something or can't do it themselves, it can't be done.
> 
> Here we go:
> Atheist puts his foot in his mouth: 
> http://www.douglasjames.com.au/walking-pano.htm
> 
> Charles Stevens (Mark Thomas 7th) Did it long before him. and I have no 
> doubt whatsoever, there will be idiots with hateful minds and no brains 
> imitating these fools long after they have left the group.
> 
> That's it for me. I'm done with the fools who think just because they
have a 
> digicam they have a clue!
> 
> Not see ya later but absolutely good bye! My new year resolution? Avoid
the 
> idiots, they'll just drag you down to their level and who want's to live
in 
> the sewer?

As one of the 'lurkers' you commented on last week I find this last 
comment interesting.  You are done with the idiots but in 2 threads you 
have started in a week you have almost begged said idiots to attack you.

First with your lurker post and now with this one.

I am not sure if there are other photo forums you all post to but I 
haven't seen anyone mention your name is early December and the only 
time they do attack you is when you post posts like this. You mentioned 
5 in your lurkers post, maybe you can mention the other 3 over the next 
few days to get them to attack you also.

I believe you love the attention.
> 
> Douglas
> 
>