Re: Stepping out a panorama (the method that can't be done!)

On Jan 28, 11:02 am, ".." <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
(a pile of steaming  ...)

Thanks to Jeff for a comprehensive expose of Doug at his worst.
Nuthin much more needs to be said, except for:

1. Why do this?
Even if Mr Magoo *had* shot the images from a different point (which
he clearly didn't), why would an 'experienced photographer' *do* that,
for a scene like this?  Yes, there are ways to deal with parallax
issues, and the success of that largely depends on the scene, so
avoiding it by shooting from the same nodal point is best.

And there probably are situations where different/staggered viewpoints
might be useful (although I am struggling to think of one right now).
But this isn't an example of it.  If he does this regularly, as he
claims, why doesn't he show us an example where there was a *point*?

2. RAM upgrade recommended..
I think Doug may need to upgrade his computer.  From that page - "And
yes! My dual CPU PC with 5 Meg of RAM labors under the strain of the
computations"...
Mmmhmm.  It probably would.  (O;


But I'm sure this is all just a leg-pull, right Doug?

PS
On Jan 21, 8:15 pm, Cryptopix <crypto...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Incidentally, anyone who now cries fowl (foul) about me "name changing
> to escape their "kill file" needs to recognize even the most basic
> newsreader filters on E-mail addresses and mine is unchanged in nearly
> 6 months. Catching out the liars is more likely correct, I think.

Since then (and not counting Sarina, Susana, etc) Doug has posted as:
"dreamtime" <parallel.dream...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
".." <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

And no doubt others.  Who, Douglas MacDonald, is the LIAR?