Re: Stepping out a panorama (the method that can't be done!)

mark.thomas.7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

>> Jeff R. wrote:
>>> As Mark has pointed out, Doug, don't you think you should either:
>>> (1) defend your stance, or
>>
>> Why?  What does he have to gain?
>
> Absolutely nothing - his position is indefensible.
> Which is why he has run like a coward.

And as I suspected your life is so empty that you have to be part of the
problem.  Sad thing is *YOU* have control over *YOU* and yet you only
demonstrate you want to posture and make noise.

> Rita likes cowards, we don't.
> Everyone may post their opinion, and there you have it - why is Rita
> so upset about this?.

Upset?  How do you figure?  Not me.  I don't have an emotional or
financial
investment in either of you.  I have nothing to gain or lose except a good
laugh.

> Rita seems to be getting a little hot and bothered lately, with all
> this cross-posting and attention seeking... You can tell when she gets
> a little upset, because the insults come thick and fast.

It would seem you'd be happy to let everyone else have a great time
laughing
at you.  Your entertainment value is priceless and shouldn't be restricted
to one group.

>>> (2) apologise to those you insulted?
>>
>> Why? You really can't insult people that have no self-respect and
>> are an insult to themselves.
>
> See - you can picture the fingers flying and spittle flying onto the
> screen.

No, just waiting for you to post a picture better than Doug's.  Only thing
you're posting is jealous rants.

>>> Really - common decency demands an answer here.  Your web page was
>>> pretty caustic.
>>
>> God!  You guys are pathetic!  You really must have missed Doug?  I
>> know Mark's life is now complete.
>
> Actually, I pick on *all* folk who lie, and don't contribute.  So
> enjoy!

And your contribution here is what, exactly?  You create noise and offer
nothing photography related.  I guess your entertainment value could be
considered a contribution.  So carry on.





Rita