Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: Canon Mark ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 8443 of 9572
Post > Topic >>

Re: Canon Mark II versus Canon Mark III

by floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Floyd L. Davidson) Feb 29, 2008 at 09:50 AM

"Jufi" <bowser@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>Sorry, that's one of the most unbiased tests out there, and it makes your
>gear look bad, and you're pissed about dumping a fortune on sub-standard
>gear.

The test was not even close to "unbiased".  Moreover, in
the end it turned out showing exactly the opposite
results than originally claimed by the OP.

You do, however, have to read past the initial two weeks
of frothing to find the truth though.

-- 
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)              floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Canon Mark II versus Canon Mark III
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-02-29 09:50:03 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 3:05:45 CST 2008.