Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: Canon Mark ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 8444 of 9572
Post > Topic >>

Re: Canon Mark II versus Canon Mark III

by Savant <2bu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM

On Feb 28, 3:55 pm, fl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:
> "jean" <try...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>http://clublexus.com/forums/showthread.php?t=326811
>
> ...
>
> >That's just ONE test, if you can find another in the same vein with
Nikon
> >coming out on top, please post it, won't make me change my camera
system but
> >it could be enjoyable reading.
>
> Ahem...  It's worse than you imagine!  In *that* test,
> the Nikon D3 actually did come out on top.  You have to
> read the whole thread (and perhaps the discussion about
> it on dpreview) though.
>
> It took a bit of work to get the RAW files from the OP,
> whose agenda and lack of technical knowledge were more
> significant than his claimed results from the cameras.
>
> In the end though, even the OP admitted the D3 produced
> superior results in his test.  He had made at least
> three very fundamental mistakes.  First, the software
> that he used was flawed.  Second he was upsizing the
> Nikon image and not the Canon image, which of course has
> a dramatic effect.  Third, he had underexposed all of
> the images by a serious amount.
>
> >> The bottom line for me is the Nikon D3 and D300 produce sharper, more
> >> lifelike images with less noise and higher ISO availability than any
Canon
> >> camera in the same price range. All the other benefits of owning
Nikon are
> >> just bonuses.
>
> That is indeed a fact...  However, your response below
> is absolutely valid!
>
> >Good, enjoy your equipment and use it well, and the more the pros dump
their
> >Canon stuff, the cheaper it will be for me, something I haven't seen
> >happening yet! drat!  (I'd put up with the lousy quality of a 500mm or
600mm
> >f4 L any day, repeat, any day, if you have one for sale, contact me and
> >since it's really crap, don't expect the price to be the same as a new
one)
>
> I use Nikon gear.  Soon enough Canon will come out with
> a camera body that is better than the D3.  I won't be
> switching then any more than you are now!  Soon enough
> after that, Nikon will come out with another camera body
> that beats the Canon.  It will be a never ending cycle
> (I hope), and we'll each buy at a peak in the cycle for
> the brand we use.  How could life get better?!
>
> --
> Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
> Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska)              fl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 for your balanced well thought out response.
Best regards,
http://www.brucekersten.com
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: Canon Mark II versus Canon Mark III
Savant <2bu@[EMAIL PRO  2008-02-29 11:00:35 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 2:09:02 CST 2008.