Re: Gone to the wall with the Mk III

doggie-duck wrote:
> "El Barto" <Homer@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:fqljv8$qt7$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>> Oh and a word to the wise Doug, it could get VERY costly if you start 
>> trying to take someone to court over a Usenet message, far to many 
>> variables to consider for the poor Judge who will in all likely hood
end 
>> up throwing it out a nothing more than a waste of his and the Courts
time. 
>> But if you have very deep pockets, you might just be the first person
in 
>> Australia to succeed with such a vexatious and difficult to define
case.
>>
>> Bart
> 
> Clearly Bart... You missed the physical threat.
> Takes it out of civil jurisdiction and into the realm of Police action 
> 
> 

I must have, Still going to be difficult and EXPENSIVE (ouch) to prove, 
for both yourself and the Police, and if it involves a State or Federal 
border the Local Plods won't want to know about it, and the Feds are up 
to their armpits in more im****tant things than trying to separate a 
pair of adults who should know better. My guess is you will be told by 
the authorities that they can do nothing until something physical 
actually happens.

Bart