Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
>> Yup.....One of the reasons why I'm still a film shooter......I've
>> still got my $1700 F5........
>
> Let's see, take a rough figure... 10,000 shots per year,
> 20,000 shots per year? Even at only 5,000, a film
> camera costs a *fortune* to use. If you only spent 50
> cents per exposure with film, the top digital camera
> will pay for itself in 2 years if you hardly use it.
On the flip side of that coin, you won't see the film shooter waste as
many
frames as you would see some of the people we now have "machine gunning"
10,000 shots at a horse show with digital and praying for a single keeper.
Rita
|
