by "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Mar 14, 2008 at 07:47 PM
RichA wrote:
>>> The crux of the problem is most Canon shooters aren't used to
>>> seeing sharp images when they use L glass.
>>
>> The problem is that you're a dishonest troll and pathetic suckup.
>
> Take a look at Nikon's 14-24mm f2.8. Look at the design. Do you
> think the cheap bastards at Canon would EVER produce something that
> radical just to obtain decent image quality? They could care LESS,
> they had the chance with the 16-35mm f2.8, a pricey lens and they did
> NOTHING much to improve it. They cynically disregard the problems
> with their gear and hope the people using their equipment will just
> take the problems in stride. Must be nice being guinea pigs.
It takes great skill and pride in manufacturing a lens as great as the
14-24/2.8 Nikkor. As for the 16-35/2.8L II, you're right! It would have
taken Canon a total redesign to make that lens work. What the hell! If
Canon shooters are with two week old spoiled meatloaf instead of fresh
properly aged filet mignon so be it.
Rita
