Re: Going Crabbing With The D3!!

TRoss wrote:

> And if you review the video again you'll discover he was comparing the
> D3 to the D2. At 5:34 he says,
>
>   What I discovered was even better than what I was
>   hoping for. It wasn't just a minor adjustments from the
>   D2x - the difference is huge. Huge. Huge.

And like you would expect him to subject a Canon body to that?  There's
nothing more disappointing than being under water and getting a friggen
"ERROR 99" message or having the AF screw up on ya.

>> The nice
>> thing with shooting the D3 is putting it in auto-ISO with a max of
>> 6400 and it does the rest for flash photography. Yes, he was
>> shooting auto-ISO.
>
> How do you know this? He doesn't mention it in the video or his blog.

No need to mention it when that is the best way to get these types of
shots
under these conditions.  Don't believe me?  You can e-mail him and I'll
bet
he will confirm he used auto-ISO.

>> Not with their own equipment.  The companies that supply these
>> lenses to their photogs use the same logic one does with a "no
>> deposit" soda bottle and throw it away when done.
>
> Go ahead, rip a page out of Rander's playbook ... if the facts don't
> exist, make 'em up. Would love to be around when someone throws away a
> 300/2.8L.

****, you should have been around when I dumped my 500/4L IS.

>>> In that case can you provide examples where exposure to 32F
>>> temperatures will cause Canon lenses to delaminate?
>>
>> NASA has done many tests on this.
>
> Link, please.

www.nasa.gov





Rita