Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: One case fo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 6 Topic 8685 of 9633
Post > Topic >>

Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing

by "Pete D" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 24, 2008 at 01:01 PM

"Doug Jewell" <ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:47e7034b$0$17341$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cryptopixel wrote:
>> http://www.clocksnprints.com/bugsat200mm.htm
> Clicked send on my other reply before I was ready. oops. Anyway, as I
said 
> before, nice pic doug.
>>
>> Sigma and other after market lens makers have some exceptional lenses
>> in their ranges. The patented nature of lens based image stabilization
>> means that these smaller makers are at a substancial disadvantage...
>> Until the likes of Pentax and Sony (to name just two) catch up with
>> camera body technology.
>>
>> The latest Pentax K20D is one example of where serious photographers
>> can save thousands of dollars and not sacrifice anything, compared to
>> buying Canon and Nikon kits. In-camera image stabilization saves
>> photographers serious money when buying excellent quality lenses.
>>
>> The Sigma 70 -200 F/2.8 (macro) that took this picture costs less than
>> half of what a VR Nikon equivalent costs. Almost enough price
>> difference to pay for a Pentax K20D body!
> Was this shot with a K20D? - I thought you were using S5's and D300s.
>>
>> It's hard to justify the weight and cost of in-lens gyros when cameras
>> with sensor based IS are now every bit as good as their Canon and
>> Nikon rivals.
> Most tests tend to show that lens based IS is better than body based,
and 
> that's probably right. But we survived so long without any IS at all,
that 
> surely there are more im****tant things to rate a system on than the 
> performance of IS with one or two particular lenses. Canon & Nikon 
> definitely have a better range of fast telephoto lenses than Pentax do -

> this makes In-Body or In-Lens IS irrelevant if it is hard to even find a

> suitable lens for the body. But certainly for someone who mostly needs 
> wide through to moderate-telephoto the Pentax system represents 
> exceptional value.

Not sure what lenses you need in Pentax mount but their 200mm F2.8 looks 
pretty good and their soon to be released 300mm F4 will probably be good
as 
well. If you really need big glass though I would suggest that Pentax is
not 
for you.

If you are shooting with a K20D it would seem that faster long lenses
while 
normally desirable may not be quite as needed as they once were because
the 
high ISO performance is getting to be so good.

Cheers.

Pete
 




 6 Posts in Topic:
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-03-24 11:26:34 
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
"Pete D" <no  2008-03-24 13:01:43 
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-03-24 16:20:34 
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
"Pete D" <no  2008-03-24 19:50:45 
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
Doug Jewell <ask@[EMAI  2008-03-24 22:46:14 
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
"Pete D" <no  2008-03-25 06:27:58 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 15:23:08 PST 2009.