Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: One case fo...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 8708 of 9633
Post > Topic >>

Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing

by "Jeff R." <contact.me@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 26, 2008 at 11:00 PM

"Cryptopixel" <cryptopix@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:9e664fb8-bb67-4dd8-aa5a-ae4a754355ed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 24, 12:37 pm, "Jeff R." <contact...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> "Pete D" <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> news:47e70bfe$0$17335$5a62ac22@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>> > "Jeff R." <contact...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> Jeff R.
>> >> (still waiting to see the stitched walking pano, BTW)
>>
>> > Now Jeff you should really be a bit more understanding here, he can't

>> > be
>> > expected to remember every stupid brainless rant he has ever had now 
>> > can
>> > he?
>>
>> True.
>> I just don't want him to forget *this* one.
>>
>> --
>> Jeff R.
>
> Well... Unlike you Jeff, I have a life that doesn't let me be a slave
> to sheep who think because they can't do it it can't be done.
>
> When I get around to it you'll get your views. In the mean time have a
> little patience. March and April are busy times for me. I'd put making
> money ahead of stimulating the bleating sheep any day. Take a pew mate
> and show some patience. All you've shown so far is a disgrace to the
> human race.

How do you figure that, Doug?
I've been civil - polite - patient so far.
I've gently pointed out your mistakes, given you op****tunities to
graciously 
retract your egregious errors.

The only insults I've directed towards you, Doug, are those which are 
implicit in my pointing out your errors.

You know the images you posted on your now-defunct web page 
http://www.mendosus.com/photography/doug.html
 were bogus and 
misrepresentative.  The insults you directed at AC (amongst others) seem
to 
have been predicated on the assumption that your "walking-pano" technique
is 
possible in the way you suggested - which of course it is not.

If I were to make an outlandish suggestion, sup****ting a technically 
untenable position, then I would expect to be called on to prove that 
position.

You have, and thus we have.

Catch is, *you* can't, and you don't have the decency (or the cohones) to 
admit you were wrong.

Being in favour of education, I would prefer in this case to be proven 
wrong -but- as noted before, I'm not holding my breath.

If calling on you to prove your impossible suggestion makes me a sheep,
then 
B-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A !

--
Jeff R.
("disgrace to the human race")
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
Cryptopixel <cryptopix  2008-03-26 04:03:49 
Re: One case for camera Image stabilizing
"Jeff R." <c  2008-03-26 23:00:16 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 17:04:18 PST 2009.