On 3/26/08 11:05 AM, in article fsds70$elr$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Matt Ion" <soundy106@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Sarina Sarin wrote:
>> Post your pictures or shut up.
>> I have had enough
>
> Fine.
> http://picasaweb.google.com/soundy106
>
> Some good, some bad. Whatever. If I posted every one of them with a
> "ZOMG THIS IS THE BEST SHOT EVAR, MY 300D OWNZ YOU ALL!" however, I'd
> probably attract the same derision as Rita does.
>
> The problem with Rita, you see, is not the quality (or lack thereof) of
> the pictures... it's the heaps of bull**** that they come with.
>
> Most irritating is that despite constantly ba****ng Brett's
> (Annika1980's) posts (and that, folks, is someone who's sharing some
> really, REALLY excellent photos), she's taken to attempting to copy his
> style of a using a clever(?) subject and lead-in to the post... except
> where Brett excels at this, Rita fails miserably.
>
> Worse is that where Brett averages a pic maybe every couple of weeks,
> Rita manages at least a couple per day. It gets a little tired and
> there's really nothing that lets one stand out from the next at that
rate.
>
> And of course, she goes on at length touting the amazing properties of
> her marvelous D3 while openly slagging other comers, particularly the
> Canons, yet nothing she's posted yet lends any foundation to this
> ba****ng. The most obvious case of this is the "best viewed at full
> size" tag below every photo... yet "full size" appears to be 1024x768 or
> less. She wants to amaze us with the clarity and crispness of her
> wonderful Nikkor glass vs. Brett's Canon L-series lenses, but has yet to
> actually offer anything where this quality would BE visible even IF it
> was there. Her 1000mm shots may be the greatest thing ever committed to
> CCD, but we'd never be able to tell from the over-processed thumbnails
> she provides. Brett, meanwhile, regularly provides full-scale,
> uncropped versions of his 40D shots.
>
> In short, she needs to put up, or shut up.
And, to add: "She" is not a "she"...
|
