Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: Processor f...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 5 Topic 8722 of 9591
Post > Topic >>

Re: Processor for photo editting

by -hh <recscuba_google@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 27, 2008 at 05:04 AM

John McWilliams <jp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> -hh wrote:
> >
> > The exercise is left up to Rita to post a screenshot of their Page-In/
> > Out values so as to back up that pesky little "Anything more than
> > 1.5GB is a waste" claim. =A0Its trivial to do this on a Mac. :-)
>
> No doubt you'll get a flippant answer that completely dodges the issue.

Yup, I did.   Apparently, "Rita" has never realized that Photoshop's
use of a scratch disk essentially means that its Virtual RAM will
exceed its Physical.  Hence, why "Rita" won't provide a screenshot of
the Activity Monitor.

In any event, my screenshot showed that Rita's flippant claim of a
Photoshop hard limit ('barrier') at 1.5GB to be utterly false.


-hh
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Re: Processor for photo editting
-hh <recscuba_google@[  2008-03-27 05:04:49 
Re: Processor for photo editting
John McWilliams <jpmcw  2008-03-27 08:00:06 
Re: Processor for photo editting
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-03-27 19:44:42 
Re: Processor for photo editting
none <nobodyhome@[EMAI  2008-03-31 16:41:38 
Re: Processor for photo editting
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-01 13:18:07 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 22:27:18 CST 2008.