Re: Real Estate photography

murrayc wrote:

>> The 12-24/4 is an OK lens and was designed as a stopgap quick fix to
>> fill the void caused by the DX format.  It was an overpriced DX hack
>> that was designed to replace the 17-35/2.8.  To even let this lens
>> touch the D3's lens mount is blasphemy!  But, then again, RE
>> photography really isn't that demanding image quality wise.
>
> Really? My experience in RE over many years says image quality means
> plenty and quality gets noticed.

Apparently not, especially when you see a lot of these hacks shuffling 
around with $150 P&S cameras, the better and more professional ones do use

some type of dSLR with the wrong lens attached.





Rita