Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: D200 vs D30...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 75 Topic 8796 of 9633
Post > Topic >>

Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600

by "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 6, 2008 at 02:57 PM

Steve wrote:

>> Don't be fooled into thinking that by shooting RAW your WB settings
>> doesn't have any effects on the image.  An improperly set WB will
>> result in a significantly higher noise floor for your RAW images.
>> This is most evident on the blue channel.  WB settings drive other
>> key camera settings that will affect image quality.
>
> Ok, so please explain to me how the camera WB setting effect the raw
> image other than by just recording what the WB setting was in the EXIF
> data and by using it for the embedded JPEGs?

There are many more articles, but here's a simple one.

"This article was great because it really dispels the myth that RAW can
fix
everything; the camera literally captures differently depending on its
white
balance setting."

<http://www.ppmag.com/web-exclusives/2007/11/white-balance-the-secret-weapo-1.html>

> Maybe I just don't understand but everything I've read and witnessed
> leads me to believe that the WB setting doesn't do anything at all to
> the image data in the raw file.

You, like many others, erroneously assume RAW data is just that, 100%
unprocessed data from the sensor, it is not.  WB is calculated into
setting
many different camera parameters, even simple ones such as how the camera
exposes an image.  True, you can always change this is post, but at a
cost.
Set you WB so you can intentionally blow your blue channel and come back
and
tell what you find after you correct it in post.  You get more leeway with
RAW than using JPG, but you are still not getting a free lunch shooting
RAW.
That is why it is so im****tant to get it right in-camera.





Rita
 




 75 Posts in Topic:
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-06 14:57:46 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Steve <steve@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 19:36:35 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-06 16:37:25 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-07 15:22:19 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-07 18:38:21 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-07 11:02:10 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-08 01:19:35 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-07 18:47:47 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-07 19:31:58 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-08 17:09:22 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-08 08:52:01 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 13:51:55 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-09 09:39:26 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-09 07:14:18 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-10 23:40:58 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-10 01:58:09 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-10 06:05:50 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
John O'Flaherty <quias  2008-04-09 23:32:21 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-07 08:33:51 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-08 01:06:14 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-07 13:17:06 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-08 06:25:18 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-07 19:32:25 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-08 17:40:52 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-08 17:33:08 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-08 17:12:46 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-08 17:30:36 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-08 07:59:00 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 07:18:09 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 09:04:56 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-09 06:11:27 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 14:32:40 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Steve <steve@[EMAIL PR  2008-04-06 19:46:49 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-06 16:38:29 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-08 10:09:01 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 07:19:36 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-08 08:05:15 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 08:35:00 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-08 15:02:47 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 19:44:53 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 14:04:37 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-09 10:21:40 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-09 07:16:35 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-09 13:53:52 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-09 19:11:47 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-09 22:16:48 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-10 12:33:29 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-09 22:35:13 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-10 17:45:26 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-10 08:35:15 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-10 08:34:18 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-08 12:09:53 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 14:02:13 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-09 06:56:29 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 14:01:13 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-08 16:46:37 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-08 14:22:48 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-09 07:14:06 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-08 23:12:54 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 14:09:27 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 19:42:39 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 14:13:39 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-09 07:14:52 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-10 02:03:47 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-09 08:55:47 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 19:43:50 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-09 07:13:08 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 13:59:32 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-09 06:43:09 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-08 19:43:36 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Jufi" <bows  2008-04-09 08:57:45 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-09 14:24:10 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Willarojo <macrophotog  2008-04-12 14:35:47 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-13 16:32:57 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
John McWilliams <jpmcw  2008-04-13 22:40:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 16:14:04 PST 2009.