Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: D200 vs D30...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 4 Topic 8808 of 9633
Post > Topic >>

Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600

by Chris Malcolm <cam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 9, 2008 at 09:32 AM

In rec.photo.digital Mr.T <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> What part of the binary system do you not understand?
> 1 binary bit is a factor of 2

Known that for over fifty years.

> 1EV stop is a factor of 2 by definition.

Ditto. 

> How much simpler can it be for even a moron to grasp the fundamentals?

Can't imagine. Why don't you tell me instead of asking me to guess?

-- 
Chris Malcolm        cam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
              DoD #205
IPAB,  Informatics,  JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
floyd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-08 02:15:05 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-08 16:02:00 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-09 14:22:44 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-09 09:32:59 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 12:43:47 PST 2009.