"Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:WWCMj.1537$ko5.1224@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Alienjones" <Alienjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:ftushp$tg$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Dudley Hanks wrote:
>> | Crop lines, that is...
>> |
>> | http://www.geocities.com/hanks.dudley/Dima.html
>> |
>> | Thanks,
>> | Dudley
>> |
>> |
>>
>> Shepard dogs are a compelling image alone, with no distractions. I
think
>> a very tight crop of the dog's face, ears and possibly chest with all
>> (any) background left in a a focus zone so blurred that nothing is
>> distinguishable.
>>
>> ****trait orientation and it would ****tray (as ****traits are supposed to
>> do) the object of attention and not the distraction of a background
that
>> can be recognized. If you use a flash pointed vertically with a
>> "Specular highlight" card on it, you will also add some life to the
>> dog's eyes, not normally available under daylight conditions.
>>
>> Some of my ****traits may help reinforce my suggestions:
>> http://www.douglasjames.com.au/****tfolio/****traits/
>>
>> Take note of the copyright covering my images if you intend to take any
>> of them without asking first ...and simply don't!
>>
>> - --
>>
>> from Douglas,
>> If my PGP key is missing, the
>> post is a forgery. Ignore it.
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>>
>> iD8DBQFIAvYUhuxzk5D6V14RAu67AJ9StHnMWXZCvRrzMujwj0s6uPcpcACfRBNe
>> jZWAbBcPrU/YDhW1qWZsuMA=
>> =D9Wv
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> OK so I'm going out on a limb here and offering the "Master" some
> critique, and in all honesty not to be vindictive but just some
> observations and maybe Doug can tell us the reasoning behind these
> particular shots, I'm always willing to learn :-)
>
> 1638: why is the hair blown messily across the face, wouldn't it be
better
> to be blowing behind the head?
> grouptree: only one person is actually looking at the camera in this
shot,
> the rest look like they want to be somewhere else.
> lady1: ****ny nose, ****ny chin, ****ny forehead.
> s****ts: neither subject is in focus.
> 4546: ****ny nose, ****ny forehead, ****ny cheek and hairstyle like she
just
> got out of bed.
>
> don't get me wrong Doug some of them are quite nice ****traits but I
though
> a ****trait was supposed to flatter the subject, not highlight the flaws.
>
> I await the inevitable tirade :-)
>
> --
> "Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
> Don Hirschberg
ROFL, is he still trying to show those old images as his best work,
hilarious but good for him.
|
