Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: D200 vs D30...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 7 Topic 8840 of 9633
Post > Topic >>

Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600

by "Mr.T" <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 14, 2008 at 07:19 PM

"Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:GuGdnZ5Kxrhw85_VnZ2dnUVZ_uXinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> BINGO!!!  We have a winner!  Since both Nikon and Canon use WB as a
factor
> in calculating exposure *BEFORE* the shutter is pulled you still can
have
a
> blown channel(s) prior to the RAW has been created.

And since any decent photographer checks and adjust his/her exposure, WB
will do nothing more for those able to properly control the exposure in
the
first place.
This obviously excludes Rita. I wonder how he/she ever managed with slide
film that is far worse in this regard!

MrT.
 




 7 Posts in Topic:
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
PixelPix <mail@[EMAIL   2008-04-12 14:04:14 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Willarojo <macrophotog  2008-04-12 23:04:36 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-13 10:13:09 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Willarojo <macrophotog  2008-04-13 12:48:30 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
Colin_D <nospam@[EMAIL  2008-04-13 10:54:45 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-13 16:32:09 
Re: D200 vs D300 at ISO 1600
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-14 19:19:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 13:03:15 PST 2009.