Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: Where do we...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 4 Topic 8853 of 9180
Post > Topic >>

Re: Where do we draw the line?

by "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 15, 2008 at 12:27 AM

"Zot" <wiz_au@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:ftvkde$hge$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Atheist Chaplain wrote,on my timestamp of 14/04/2008 4:35 PM:
>
>>
>> OK so I'm going out on a limb here and offering the "Master" some 
>> critique, and in all honesty not to be vindictive but just some 
>> observations and maybe Doug can tell us the reasoning behind these 
>> particular shots, I'm always willing to learn :-)
>>
>> 1638: why is the hair blown messily across the face, wouldn't it be 
>> better to be blowing behind the head?
>> grouptree: only one person is actually looking at the camera in this 
>> shot, the rest look like they want to be somewhere else.
>> lady1: ****ny nose, ****ny chin, ****ny forehead.
>> s****ts: neither subject is in focus.
>> 4546: ****ny nose, ****ny forehead, ****ny cheek and hairstyle like she
just 
>> got out of bed.
>>
>> don't get me wrong Doug some of them are quite nice ****traits but I 
>> though a ****trait was supposed to flatter the subject, not highlight
the 
>> flaws.
>>
>> I await the inevitable tirade :-)
>>
>
>
> Fair comments.  But let me say
> over the years I've seen much worse
> from so-called "wedding photographers".
> A *lot* worse...
>
> What baffles me is what the heck
> is that s****ts photo doing in
> a ****traits section...
> Perhaps Doug would be able to move
> it somewhere else?  It ain't make
> sense, if you pardon the weird
> 'nglish.
>
> As for it being out of focus,
> I think the front subject is just
> blurred by movement: not a problem in a
> s****ts photo.  Not *all* subjects in
> *all* photos need to be pinsharp in
> order for a photo to convey a feeling.
>
> In fact when it comes to s****ts, I'd
> rather see something that suggests movement.
>
> Dunno if you agree with that or not,
> just my $0.02.

you might be right about the movement blur, but when you look at *good* 
s****ts photography the subject can be doing 40 knots on skis behind a boat

and still be pin sharp, and the scene conveys the sense of motion very
well. 
one would expect a photographer of Doug's self proclaimed reputation and 
stature to at least get something a elemental as focus and composition 
correct :-)
having said that, Doug is a wedding photographer after all :-)
-- 
God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?
 




 4 Posts in Topic:
Re: Where do we draw the line?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-14 06:35:34 
Re: Where do we draw the line?
"Pete D" <no  2008-04-14 18:21:21 
Re: Where do we draw the line?
Zot <wiz_au@[EMAIL PRO  2008-04-14 22:58:20 
Re: Where do we draw the line?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-15 00:27:57 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 19:51:08 CDT 2008.