Re: The D3 Gets A Taste Of Red Meat!!

In article <k6ednRoesO0-Q5bVnZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
"RitaBerkowitz" <ritaberk2008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>  PixelPix wrote:
>  
>>>>      Sorry, I don't do research for people without being
>>>> compensated, especiallyfor people that know the answer and are
>>>> afraid of it.

>>>>     Sorry but will I continue to label your spew as BS unless you
>>>> grow some balls and backup one of your statements.... I won't hold
>>>> my
>>>>     breath.

>>>    www.google.com

>>   I will do better than that...
>>  
>>   http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068
>>  
>>   At no stage did I see that Canon denied there was a problem.  What
>> I did see was Canon taking reasonable steps to determine what the
>> problem was and then offering measures to rectify the issue.

>  See how easy that was?  Now read through *ALL* 18 pages of it to
> find the answer you seek.  Did you count all the firmware updates?
> You call that reasonable?  I call it denial.  True, the typical canon
> shooter is accustomed to never ending firmware updates, but this is a
> bit over the top, even for Canon.  Let's not forget the way Canon
> ignored Rob till they caughtso much heat from all the other forum
>  readers.
>  
>>   What this does is once again show that your statements are BS!

>  No, it once again shows you only see what you want to see.  Now go
> Google upthe French agency that got threatened by Canon.
>  
>  
>  
>  Rita
> 

More spew and BS!

-- 
I'm using an evaluation license of nemo since 170 days.
You should really try it!
http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo