Re: New camera, test shots...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Noons wrote:
| On Apr 23, 11:46 am, "Alan Meyer" <amey...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
|> "Focus" <fo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
|>
|> news:uPqdnTjL-9d5Q5HVnZ2dnUVZ8gydnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|>
|>> Bought a new camera after selling my D300.
|>> I'm not unsatisfied:
|>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
|> Don't know if it's the camera or what you did in Photoshop, but
|> the colors look a tad too vivid for me.
|>
|> Some cameras have a setting for "natural" and "vivid" color.  If
|> yours is set for vivid, you might try the other setting to see if you
|> like them better.
|>
|> Of course a lot of people like that.kind of vivid "pop".  So it
|> might be just right if you're one of them.
|
|
| Wasn't going to mention it but since you did,
| I found the same thing.  Thought it might be one of those
| screen profile thingies but obviously I'm not the only one
| thinking the same.

When you take a new Nikon DSLR out of the box and shoot some stuff they
all look like this until you tone it down. From what I saw in Tokyo
recently, The Japanese youth are very much into bright colours. So it
would seem are many of my clients.

Personally I've never seen colours this vivid on an overcast day. I
recall in 1999 getting a "revolutionary" Canon P&S. The first 1 Mp P&S
on the market, so I was told.

I was quite surprised to see how vivid it's photos were out of my old
Epson Stylus Pro. Plastic colours were faithfully reproduced - right
along with plastic skin tones!

- --

from Douglas,
If my PGP key is missing, the
post is a forgery. Ignore it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFIDvA2huxzk5D6V14RAoB****CXIEExB2Dx5nGUk1cgbppkkkdIPACfYz1g
Tp4zTsp7DiJiojFgvYK1cz0=
=K1Lb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----