Re: A DAY AT THE BALLPARK!

"Alienjones" <Alienjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fus8r6$5m0$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The amazing thing about all of this Jeff, is you are being manipulated
by 
> a swine far smarter than you are and don't know it. The prick started
out 
> calling himself Charles Stevens and lately calls himself Mark Thomas. 
> Neither name were ever on any electoral roll or in the phone book in the

> places he claimed to have lived.

You miss my point entirely.

I couldn't give a sideways about someone else here, Doug.  I am
challenging 
*you* to make good *your* claims.  Just because someone else happens to 
agree with me does not mean I am being manipulated by him. (Except to the 
extent that I am taking the bait of your trolling, of course - but that is

voluntary.)


>
> What that swine didn't tell you is many of the names he came up with 
> lasted only one posting. But the he was right in one thing, they all
came 
> from the one IP address- My ROUTER!

Do you deny employing sockpuppets - for the purpose of deception?  IOW, 
lying.
Even allowing for "exchange students" using your account/router/PC for
their 
own(?) purposes?

>
> And if you can't understand why I think it's huge joke - around here it
is 
> bigger than huge- then the joke is on you mate... Again.

No - the joke is not on me.
I don't use sockpuppets, and I have no childish behaviour to defend.

>
> As for proving anything to you? Why? Just because you can't do it is not

> in itself reason enough for anyone to believe I can't either. If you
have 
> a problem getting your head around the fact someone is smarter than
you... 
> Go take a shower. Otherwise join the queue and wait.

Doug - maybe you need a shower yourself.
Would you like me to outline the lies, insults and errors of fact present
on 
your *one* webpage? Just one page? (Never mind all the others.)
I'm not interested in some silly contest proving who is smarter than who. 
I'm just concerned, for your sake, that you should display a little
honesty, 
admit you were wrong and (ideally) apologise for the intemperate comments 
you made.

My request to you to prove that you *can* produce a walking pano from the 
examples you provided, is, of course, just a tease.  Obviously you cannot,

as has been demonstrated completely and thoroughly on these pages already.

Walking panos are (of course!) possible, but not with the type of images
you 
posted.


> Aren't you the one who gave me a hard time about my regional calendars?

No Doug.  That wasn't me.  It must have been another one of your admirers.
I had a go at you for having a go at macro photography of insects (and the

like).  Remember?

> You sure are a slow learner who gets in with the wrong crowd.

I *am* a slow learner.  That's the best kind.  We absorb what we learn and

retain it.  Its kind'a like dieting.  Crash diets don't work in the long 
term, and neither does "crash" learning.

I'm not "in" with any crowd online.
If you think I'm joining a group just to pick on you, I suggest you go and

look up "paranoia".

>  Take a shower mate. Chill out and come back for some more fun and
games. 
> Usenet is loaded with 'em!

Profound.
Its just a shame there is so much dishonesty on Usenet.

You know the type I mean:
* sockpuppetry
* bragging about imaginary exploits
* bragging about imaginary abilities
* gratuitous insults to those who challenge you.

That sort of thing.

--
Jeff R.
(still waiting to be shown up)