In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Mr.T <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:crTRj.6255$ko5.2801@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> the fact still remains that you touched up the photo with PS CS3 yet
you
>> still left in the Brides ****ny nose, not only that, by leaving it as
the
>> sharp centre of focus its a beacon drawing the eye right to it, and as
to
>> all your backdrop crap at least its not a 3 draw steel filing cabinet
:-)
>> Just because you try and give a photo provenance does not instantly
make
> it
>> artistic, this photo is a prime example.
>> you admit to shopping this photo, maybe you should have shopped out the
>> reflected glare from the Brides nose, and maybe lightened her nose a
bit,
>> then she won't look like she has had a bit to much to drink.
> Why bother, it would still be just mush.
> That a supposed professional would post that as a great example of his
work
> amazes me.
What distinguishes a professional is being able to produce the
required results to spec and on time. They don't necessarily have to
be good, especially in an area of fierce price competition such as
weddings.
--
Chris Malcolm cam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DoD #205
IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]
|
