On Apr 30, 5:05=A0am, Alienjones <Alienjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> It's all too easy to take technically perfect photos of mundane objects.
> What has always eluded many, many people who take up a camera and set
> about taking photos of birds and ducks and golfers is the art of the
> medium. If I didn't have a camera I would still sketch or paint my
> pictures...
The implication is that a technically brilliant photograph somehow
isn't artistic.
This is bull****, of course. The fact is that your pics are neither
technically passable nor artistic in any sense that anyone can see.
Whatever emotion you think you are trying to convey gets lost when you
make glaring errors like you did in the photo just posted. This may
get lost on the old women who look at your canvas prints at your
weekend stall, but to anyone having a passing interest in photography
your errors will stand out like a sore thumb.
That pic looks like the work of a child taking her first year class in
Photography, not the work of a working pro with 3000 years
experience.
You should be embarrassed.


|