On Apr 30, 7:02=A0am, Alienjones <Alienjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> Hand made refers to individually corrected photos as opposed to those
> pumped out from a camera's flash card at a kiosk or mini lab.
So "hand made" means "Photoshopped?"
Damn, who knew I'd been making hand-made images all this time?
> Genuine photographs refers to photographs developed in chemicals as
> opposed to "digital" prints which are made on a glorified laser printer
> or dye sublimation printer.
"Photographs developed in chemicals" is usually called film.
These can be printed on a number of different printers, however.
>
> Almost no modern day processing labs use optical printing anymore. It's
> pretty much all digital. I use a digital head on a Durst, 4x5 enlarger
> to make genuine hand made photographs on real photo paper. The
> difference is visible.
How do you make am optical print from a digital file? I thought you
had to use a film recorder or something like that?
> Apart from the Mitsubi**** processor I have for developing these genuine
> photographs, I also use dye Sublimation prints for some applications
> where on-the-spot delivery is required. Sometimes I use these in budget
> priced albums for convenience.
So are these advertised as not genuine?
> I also use an inkjet (HP Z2400) wide format printer for canvas prints
> and any photographic prints larger than I can put through my processor.
More non genuine prints. Are they advertised as such?
> The idiots who respond with their own form of useless banter are just
> plain old fa****oned idiots with no interest in photography. They just
> get their rocks off taking the mickey out of working photographers.
Only working photographers with questionable ethics and business
practices.
You sir, are more shady than my back yard.
|
