On Apr 30, 9:06=A0am, Annika1980 <annika1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 30, 5:05=A0am, Alienjones <Alienjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's all too easy to take technically perfect photos of mundane
objects.=
> > What has always eluded many, many people who take up a camera and set
> > about taking photos of birds and ducks and golfers is the art of the
> > medium. If I didn't have a camera I would still sketch or paint my
> > pictures...
>
> The implication is that a technically brilliant photograph somehow
> isn't artistic.
> This is bull****, of course. =A0The fact is that your pics are neither
> technically passable nor artistic in any sense that anyone can see.
> Whatever emotion you think you are trying to convey gets lost when you
> make glaring errors like you did in the photo just posted. This may
> get lost on the old women who look at your canvas prints at your
> weekend stall, but to anyone having a passing interest in photography
> your errors will stand out like a sore thumb.
>
> That pic looks like the work of a child taking her first year class in
> Photography, not the work of a working pro with 3000 years
> experience.
> You should be embarrassed.
" The implication is that a technically brilliant photograph somehow
isn't artistic.
This is bull****, of course."
This is so true. When technical excellence and the emotion of the
moment are captured.....you have what every photographer strives to
achieve.
Check out your local art gallery and see the paintings and photographs
of the Masters. There are birds, ducks, ****traits famous golfers,
etc. They are far from being mundane.
|
