Another long post. This may be a useful thread for Doug's legal team
(grin) in future, for it will have links to most of the worst pieces of
bull**** Doug has ever posted - and I'll just refer to it.. Keep it up,
Doug.
(I KNEW he would bite on the snipped version, by the way. That way he
didn't have to answer anything. Sooo predictable.)
Alienjones wrote:
> Lies like when you posted your crap from a SA Government computer.
Ummmm, how is that a 'lie'?
What a bloody moron. Every TAFESA library computer is a SA Gov't
computer, and how does the posting origin turn a post into a lie?...
The only time posting origin is im****tant is when some dufus (like
Douglas) pretends he is someone else, not realising he has left his arse
hanging out for all to see, in the headers. As I don't sockpuppet, my
posting origins are irrelevant, but Doug is free to take it up with..
er.. someone who cares... (O:
How IS Graham Hunt and his fraudulent claims, I wonder? Is he ever
going to defend his actions? And whatever happened to those
TechnoAussie Digital Print Centres, after Doug sold the enlarging
secrets to Samsung? (O:
> Lies like when you said I couldn't enlarge digital images.
I said, and will continue to say, he couldn't do it *as well as he
claimed*, and he did not possess any magic algorythm. And I graciously
pointed out where he *lied and cheated with his fake examples* (link
below to just one example) and his bull**** claims of "REAL ADDED
DETAIL"..
By the way, that is an ACTUAL QUOTE. I'm happy to post the link to
where he used those words. (If anyone else asks I will, but everyone
here now knows he's a liar).
Douglas, listen up. When you put something in "quotes", it needs to be
something that was actually *said*. Do you understand? Do you need
simpler one syllable words, perhaps? Because down below you do it all
wrong.
> Lies like when you eventually conceded I could but not to your high
(ROTFL)
> standards.
That is what I *always* said. And of course he cheated in every
demonstration he posted, with just one exception. Shall I post those
examples too? All the threads and pages where he claimed enlargement...
but actually showed REDUCTIONs. Here's one - note the way Doug's claims
were demolished here -...
http://www.photokb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/photo-au/5503
/Enlarging-digital-images-examples
> Lies like when you posted defamation about me not having any licenses
from
> the EPA to photograph in National Parks ("Liar Doug, the EPA doesn't
have
> anything to do with national parks")
Now, here we go, Doug. Got your tiny brain in gear??
Let's have a little lesson on ""'s. Yes, "Quotes". Those little things
you put around words to show that they were ACTUALLY SAID. Now, *you*
put quotes around this -
"Liar Doug, the EPA doesn't have anything to do with national parks".
Which suggests to anyone with half a brain or more, that I actually said
it. But I *didn't*. Easily proven - just search for those words.
So YOU are a miserable low-life LIAR, Douglas "St James" MacDonald. If
you claim I *did* say those words, then simply post the link. Go on.
Anytime.
What I DID point out, CORRECTLY, was:
- he misnamed the department from which the permit was issued
- he claimed having a permit to photograph was a badge of honour (and it
isn't, just a meaningless money raiser)
- he ALSO falsely claimed to have permits from ATSIC to shoot in
indigenous communities. ATSIC not only DIDN'T issue such permits, it
had been disbanded for some time...
The whole concept of an organisation giving blanket permission to shoot
indigenous people and scenes across Oz is just laughable, as anyone who
understands indigenous culture here knows only too well. (That doesn't
include Doug, clearly.)
Here's the link if anyone gives a toss - where all Doug's lies (and
senile memories) are exposed:
http://phorums.com.au/archive/index.php/t-148691.html
The sad tale is spread over several pages - I suggest you don't bother..
unless you are, of course, Doug's solicitor (grin).
> And when I posted a scan of my license? "Oh anyone can get one of
those!"
True, they can. And indeed *have to* if shooting commercially in a
national park. But Doug ****trayed it as that badge of honour! Wanker...
But now why won't he post a scan of that ATSIC permit... (O:
> More lies like when you posted that I was a liar, I didn't have any
> "shopfronts".
Good quoting, BRAVO!! Yes, I have indeed said "shopfronts". Shame,
shame, shame. (O:
I simply asked - where are they? As did a few others, wanting to see if
the hype was up to his false claims... But he posted one shot of a
shopfront (that was photoshopped, and I can prove it) and then admitted
he was no longer there. Pointless, stupid exercise from a pointless,
stupid twerp.
NOT ONCE has Douglas had the guts to post a single address of ANY of his
claimed franchises/businesses. Anyone care to guess why?
Yep, you got it. (O:
Don't get me wrong - he does genuinely seem to run a lame-ass web-based
business and manages to sell wedding packages on Ebay.
Maybe. But does he do it well? Can he do what he has claimed? Does he
own printing franchises?
He claimed to own photo-printing franchises, but then posted a hilarious
and very embarrassing 'treatise' that superbly demonstrated he didn't
have a frigging clue about the realities of printing systems:
http://phorums.com.au/archive/index.php/t-267293.html
Note how Russ, Doug Jewell and others ripped Mr MacDonald's 'knowledge'
into absolute shreds..
Black in the green channel?
Printers using video feeds?
Fuji Frontier working just like a laser printer?
Never seen such bull**** in my life.
> What happened when I posted a photo of one? You found another of my
> business's to harass from the list on the window. Nice swine you are.
Please post full details of this new fantasy. You are a LIAR again.
Who, and how exactly were they allegedly harassed? How did you
allegedly identify me? Put up or shut up, bull**** artist.
> And what happened when world renown photographer, Gordon Moat refereed a
> challenge from another idiot with your mentality - Alan Browne from
Canada
> about my enlargement algorithm? More lies you yelled. You , a ****hin
idiot
> from nowhere, contradicting a specialist's findings.
Well brought up, Doug. Here's the link where Gordon Moat himself gently
corrects Doug's misquoting, and makes it very clear about what he
actually said:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.photo.equipment.35mm
/browse_frm/thread/f0bc2af22e84217b/
Also ask Alan Browne what he now thinks of Doug... Also Avery, Colin
D., Gisle Hannemyr.. and *many* others - all of whom have been misquoted
(aka more LIES) by Douglas MacDonald.
> And then there was the incident when you sneaked around like the swine
you
> are, waiting for my missus to go for a pee before you rushed in and
snapped
> off some photos of my canvas enlargements.
Another demonstrably FALSE claim. Douglas claims he has this imaginary
event on security camera. Yet, when asked to describe me, he goes VERY
quiet again. Why? Because, sadly for Doug, there is something very
noticeable about me (even from a distance), and unfortunately Doug
doesn't know what that is. Which leaves him stuffed.. (- which is what
happens to *all* filthy liars...)
So his LIE is exposed again, by his silence. He has no such footage,
and I never did anything like he claims, of course. Think about it -
even if such a ridiculous event had happened - how on earth would he
know it was me? What sort of twisted mind does this maniac have, to
make up this absolute bull****? Interestingly, the story has changed
twice - I allegedly stole stuff in one version. But Douglas keeps
forgetting his lies.
> What a total loser you are Stevens. Yeah That is your real name, isn't
it?
No. Why do you think it is? Why don't you just send some mail to my
address (it's real), or give your solicitor's name? I'm ready.
> You just got expelled from my fan club. LIAR, STALKER and all round
nasty
> bastard.
Yes, Douglas, whatever you say. Good to see you setting the example -
as shown in the above links.
Enjoy your current reputation, and don't be afraid to post that "stepped
out panorama" whenever ready... I'll be starting a new post shortly, to
discuss the concept (ie linear vs 'normal' panoramas) in some detail.
I'd get in first, if I was you... Could be very embarrassing...
Have a great weekend, Doggie. See if you can churn out some more
masterpieces like you have just posted, so you can bask in all that
acclaim...
(O:
(O:
(O:
----
Anyway, just so's there some image content here, and as a reward (or
punishment!) for anyone crazy enough to read this far, here's some
irrelevant picha's (already posted before, sorry..):
http://www.marktphoto.com/examples/pano5copy_smallcrop.jpg
http://www.marktphoto.com/examples/currumbin1.jpg
http://www.marktphoto.com/examples/cazneauxtree.jpg
http://www.marktphoto.com/examples/brisbane_morn_small.jpg
http://www.marktphoto.com/examples/leaper.jpg
|
