"Chris Malcolm" <cam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:67r1acF2otbvqU2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Mr.T <MrT@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> "Atheist Chaplain" <abused@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:crTRj.6255$ko5.2801@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> the fact still remains that you touched up the photo with PS CS3 yet
you
>>> still left in the Brides ****ny nose, not only that, by leaving it as
the
>>> sharp centre of focus its a beacon drawing the eye right to it, and as
to
>>> all your backdrop crap at least its not a 3 draw steel filing cabinet
:-)
>>> Just because you try and give a photo provenance does not instantly
make
>> it
>>> artistic, this photo is a prime example.
>>> you admit to shopping this photo, maybe you should have shopped out
the
>>> reflected glare from the Brides nose, and maybe lightened her nose a
bit,
>>> then she won't look like she has had a bit to much to drink.
>
>> Why bother, it would still be just mush.
>> That a supposed professional would post that as a great example of his
work
>> amazes me.
>
> What distinguishes a professional is being able to produce the
> required results to spec and on time. They don't necessarily have to
> be good,
Well i guess that describes Douglas work perfectly.
especially in an area of fierce price competition such as
> weddings.
>
> --
> Chris Malcolm cam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DoD #205
> IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
> [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]
>
|
