Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Aussie Photographing > Re: Gone with t...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 38 of 103 Topic 8904 of 9633
Post > Topic >>

Re: Gone with the what?

by "XxYyZz" <XxYyZz@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 1, 2008 at 01:16 PM

"Alienjones" <Alienjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fvaosj$j7c$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Annika1980 wrote:
> | On Apr 30, 5:05 am, Alienjones <Alienjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> |> It's all too easy to take technically perfect photos of mundane
objects.
> |> What has always eluded many, many people who take up a camera and set
> |> about taking photos of birds and ducks and golfers is the art of the
> |> medium. If I didn't have a camera I would still sketch or paint my
> |> pictures...
> |
> | The implication is that a technically brilliant photograph somehow
> | isn't artistic.
> | This is bull****, of course.  The fact is that your pics are neither
> | technically passable nor artistic in any sense that anyone can see.
> | Whatever emotion you think you are trying to convey gets lost when you
> | make glaring errors like you did in the photo just posted. This may
> | get lost on the old women who look at your canvas prints at your
> | weekend stall, but to anyone having a passing interest in photography
> | your errors will stand out like a sore thumb.
> |
> | That pic looks like the work of a child taking her first year class in
> | Photography, not the work of a working pro with 3000 years
> | experience.
> | You should be embarrassed.
> |
> |
>
> |
> I'm sorry...
> Applications for my fan club have now closed.


  Couldn't find anyone dumb enough to apply ?


Unfortunately you failed
> to meet the standard required for member****p. It requires firstly that
> you are human... You failed.


  The second qualification is that you must be legally blind !


>
> The curious thing about your attacks on me is how they intensify when
> you discover they have no effect. Do you really think you are achieving
> anything but your own destruction in doing this?


   By the rabidness of your replies I"ll bet your "no effect" calim is 
bull**** !


>
> If I thought for a single moment your comments were anything other than
> an attack of jealousy, I might be concerned by them.


  Then why do you post back so many times stating that the comments don't 
bother you ? If you really felt that way you wouldn't constantly bring up
the 
issue !

>
> Interestingly enough, you have an intense preoccupation with illegally
> downloading my photos and pasting your ****ography into them. Your
> obsession with me is flattering in the extreme but reaching the point of
> stalking.


  Isn't this where you are suppose to state that your "legal team" is
going to 
take action ????


>
> So here's a tip for you that has gotten me world wide recognition as a
> photographer and a full booking sheet for wedding photography for the
> rest of this year and most of next year...


  Only take the legally blind as clients as they are happy no matter how
poor 
the photogrphy ?



>
> Never try and sell sand to an Arab or ice the an Eskimo.
>
> Far from me being embarrassed, it is you who should be embarrassed for
> the way normal people pity rather than scorn you.


   Don't be jealous just because he takes better photos than you.




 Your pathetic and
> constant attacks on me are well do***ented at http://www.annika1980.com.


   That website is like you Douglas, full of hot air !



>
> Why you tried to crack my seller account at Ebay after your attempt to
> disrupt the sale of my panoramas failed, is something you really ought
> to seek help about.

 Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa....     Mommy, Bret's picking on me again........



>
> The obsession you have with stealing and illegally altering my clearly
> copyrighted images and turning them into ****ography is probably the
> most indicative example yet, of a pathetic little wannabe turned
> stalker... Why? It'll only lead to your own demise.
>
> - --
>
> from Douglas,
> If my PGP key is missing, the
> post is a forgery. Ignore it.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFIGOd5huxzk5D6V14RAs8nAJ9M89uESDlgLMjMAVQ4+evrnn/hIgCfUaFk
> l2A2jh01+Bcd9Yhv0G0AUXw=
> =lCD0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 




 103 Posts in Topic:
Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-30 10:24:33 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-30 00:32:33 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-04-29 19:13:46 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-30 13:50:08 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-30 05:27:36 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-30 15:51:08 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-04-30 06:30:51 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 11:46:08 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-05-04 20:58:56 
Re: Gone with the what?
Chris Malcolm <cam@[EM  2008-04-30 10:51:56 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 12:58:34 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-05-02 15:35:45 
Re: Gone with the what?
TRoss <tross003@[EMAIL  2008-04-30 00:37:25 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 12:56:38 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-02 05:18:25 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 19:33:06 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Yoshi" <dre  2008-05-02 21:22:22 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 11:41:57 
Re: Gone with the what?
JT's Ghost <justatroll  2008-04-30 03:15:36 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 11:52:30 
Re: Gone with the what?
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-04-30 01:07:06 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-30 19:05:54 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-30 19:09:29 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Rob." <mesa  2008-04-30 22:28:07 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 13:05:27 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 11:58:33 
Re: Gone with the what?
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-04-30 04:02:36 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-04-30 06:06:13 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-01 07:41:13 
Re: Gone with the what?
^Toby-Temuchin^ <brook  2008-05-01 09:39:54 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 13:17:57 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Neil Harrington&quo  2008-05-01 01:09:14 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-01 15:59:24 
Re: Gone with the what?
Zot <wizofoz2k@[EMAIL   2008-05-01 22:37:22 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Neil Harrington&quo  2008-05-01 20:22:18 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-02 11:35:42 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Neil Harrington&quo  2008-05-02 00:42:16 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 13:16:32 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 14:06:49 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 18:47:12 
Re: Gone with the what?
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-04-30 06:24:36 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-04-30 18:34:39 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-01 13:24:54 
Re: Gone with the what?
^Tems^ <brookersteve91  2008-05-01 14:57:18 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 13:18:26 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-01 08:17:16 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-02 05:36:27 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-05-02 23:03:09 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-01 09:01:27 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-01 15:48:59 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-02 08:32:14 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-02 21:11:03 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 12:21:37 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-03 07:38:09 
Re: Gone with the what?
jdear64 <jdear64@[EMAI  2008-04-30 01:37:50 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Pete D" <no  2008-04-30 18:58:53 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Rob." <mesa  2008-04-30 22:25:52 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Pete D" <no  2008-05-01 06:25:53 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-04-30 19:06:09 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-04-30 21:02:42 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Rob." <mesa  2008-04-30 22:41:07 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-04-30 06:14:52 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-05-02 15:43:58 
Re: Gone with the what?
JPDFDA@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-04-30 06:09:29 
Re: Gone with the what?
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-04-30 09:40:41 
Re: Gone with the what?
Online News Server <ne  2008-04-30 23:42:16 
Re: Gone with the what?
RichA <rander3127@[EMA  2008-04-30 10:24:53 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-01 07:13:12 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 18:51:33 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-04 11:49:21 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-04 06:44:51 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Atheist Chaplain&qu  2008-05-04 21:02:01 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Neil Harrington&quo  2008-05-04 10:42:53 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Frank Arthur"   2008-04-30 13:42:07 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-01 07:19:26 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Neil Harrington&quo  2008-04-30 20:04:57 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 19:06:25 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Neil Harrington&quo  2008-05-04 10:47:09 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 19:02:44 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Mr.T" <MrT@  2008-05-05 19:19:19 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Jeff R." <c  2008-05-05 23:26:24 
Re: Gone with the what?
^Toby-Temuchin^ <brook  2008-05-01 09:50:37 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-04-30 18:39:44 
Re: Gone with the what?
^Tems^ <brookersteve91  2008-05-01 12:37:14 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Rita Berkowitz"  2008-04-30 20:19:52 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-01 13:07:21 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 13:29:44 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 19:17:33 
Re: Gone with the what?
"RobertJM" <  2008-05-04 01:36:06 
Re: Gone with the what?
Robert Coe <bob@[EMAIL  2008-05-03 21:06:04 
Re: Gone with the what?
Helen <helensilverburg  2008-05-03 17:18:43 
Re: Gone with the what?
Colin_D <nospam@[EMAIL  2008-05-01 15:48:43 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-01 15:39:39 
Re: Gone with the what?
TRoss <tross003@[EMAIL  2008-05-01 16:23:35 
Re: Gone with the what?
Alienjones <Alienjones  2008-05-02 09:30:33 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 20:17:46 
Re: Gone with the what?
TRoss <tross003@[EMAIL  2008-05-02 01:53:27 
Re: Gone with the what?
"Neil Harrington&quo  2008-05-04 11:07:23 
Re: Gone with the what?
Harold Hughes <bighazz  2008-05-05 14:42:09 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 19:42:29 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-01 04:25:55 
Re: Gone with the what?
Annika1980 <annika1980  2008-05-01 20:08:53 
Re: Gone with the what?
"XxYyZz" <Xx  2008-05-01 12:51:15 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 14:57:06 PST 2009.