-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Annika1980 wrote:
| On May 1, 1:59 am, Alienjones <Alienjo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
|> My accountant see it making money.
|
| I kinda doubt that pic will sell too many copies.
|
|> It's a perfect image to set as a talking point.
|>
|> I'm not sure if you've noticed Neil, but my purpose in posting it has
|> been served well...
|>
|> To get people talking about photography and (hopefully) explore their
|> own creativity in the process. You should try it sometime or is the
|> likely hood one of the trolls might do a number on you too daunting?
|
| I'll give you credit for posting the pic at least and generating
| discussion.
| Hopefully, maybe you or someone else can benefit from the comments.
|
| And as much as you like ragging on my ass, you will at least have to
| admit that I post my pics under my real name ... and I leave them up
| and don't yank them down whenever someone cirtiques them. And I don't
| hide behind 100 aliases .... just this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh give us a break Bret.
You are the biggest sock puppet user on Usenet. Be honest for a change.
You don't have to yank down the photos you post... Because they're mine!
I get them taken down legally.
Like these: http://www.annika1980.com/plagiarized.htm
And more recently from the legal team at AOL:
Thank you for your complaint. The account has been closed and your
images removed from our servers.
Don't try your bull**** here Bret. You are one of the worst trolls on
Usenet. Not hesitating to engage in illegal activities the "get back" at
anyone who criticizes your happy snaps. Like this despicable attempt to
sabotage the sale of my prints: http://www.annika1980.com/cracking.htm
All your illegal attacks on me (that are verified) are described clearly
here: http://www.annika1980.com
Taking another photographer's images and reposting them with ****ography
pasted into them is about as low as you can go. It doesn't bother me
anymore but it sure shows you up for the childish idiot you are.
- --
from Douglas,
If my PGP key is missing, the
post is a forgery. Ignore it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFIGhu7huxzk5D6V14RAixcAJwI5VY6vt+a1xWVbm3Sq/1R6v/inACgnl0P
JpIPj2OMAV5YBOwo4Sgx0C4=
=Nx2R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
