"Alienjones" <Alienjones@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:g0n6j8$t8s$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Atheist Chaplain wrote:
>> "Online News Server" <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>>
>> I'm thinking that once Jeff stumps up to Douggie's legal team with his
>> own raft of counter evidence the legal eagles will be advising the
stupid
>> stalker to back out now before it gets real ugly for him, though I
doubt
>> that Douggie is smart enough to take the advice (well I hope he is to
>> dumb to know when he is out gunned and out maneuvered) Maybe we will
get
>> to see the "Worlds Greatest Wedding Photographer" running from the ACA
>> re****ters with a towel draped around his fat ugly head :-)
>
> ----------------
>
> The opinion of a Usenet stalker and demonstrated bully like you is
> definitely a valuable contribution. If you had ever owned any
intellectual
> property and found the need to protect it, you'd know differently than
the
> bull**** you just posted.
>
I have said it on may occasions Douggie, I have no problem whatsoever with
you persuing any copyright infirngment you feel the need to. I do however
take umbrage to you calling me a stalker and a bully when all I have done
in
the past is call you out on your lies and deceptions, by the way, how is
Graham Hunt?
I don't undertake searches of DMV records or Electoral roles or even the
white pages to try and track down my detractors Douggie, you, on the other
hand have openly admitted to this stalking type behavior.
I beleive that the rest of your usual multi paragraph ranting should be
directed to Jeff R (though why you would bother as he has already more
than
ably addressed your entire argument, and is more than willing to defend
his
case against you in the proper medium of the Queensland justice system)
You
continual re-ha****ng of all these legal ins and outs is doing nothing for
your chance of a resolution in your favour, and could very well be
described
by Jeff R's Legal representative as undue harrasment and bullying, maybe
its
time to reconsider your on-line stance.
--
God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?
> It's idiots like you, spreading false information with no shred of legal
> sup****t that encourages copyright theft.
>
> The fact is Jeff Ralph has every right to disagree with me. He has every
> right to provide his own set of examples to sup****t his argument.
>
> What he doesn't have is any right at all to do, is use my copyright
image
> on his web site without my permission... For any purpose whatsoever.
>
> The law provided a pathway for publishers and web site owners to
prosecute
> those people who are too lazy to create their own material and too
> miserable to pay for it.
>
> It's not as if he doesn't have the resources to produce his own
examples.
> He's just too lazy to do it. Instead he tries to use my intellectual
> property to harass and intimidate me into wasting my time "proving" what
> he already admitted he knows...
>
> That my suggestion to another subscriber he could make a stunning and
> unusual, flat field panorama by moving the camera instead of rotating
it,
> is used every day buy architectural photographers.
>
> If he was the least bit interested in seeing one of my examples, I could
> have sent him to nearby Ebenezer (NSW) where 3 of my "stepped out
> panoramas" are displayed in a mansion near the Hawksbury river.
>
> Instead this idiot decided to steal part of my web site containing four
> copyright images and set about with his attempts to use them illegally.
If
> you think for a single moment he has any defense, you are a bigger idiot
> than he is.
|
