Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Dark Rooms > Re: Improved T-...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 90 Topic 3997 of 4297
 Post > Topic >>

Re: Improved T-Max 400

by "Nicholas O. Lindan" <see@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 14, 2007 at 10:15 AM

Beyer <jeandavid8@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>I do not understand how you could get such different results.

The difugalties may be due to differences in format --
what's good in MF or LF can be Gawd-awful in 35mm.

And then there are all the other differences: subject
matter, exposure preference, development, printing
contrast ...

Amazing any two people can agree about a film at all.

-- 
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Darkroom Automation: F-Stop Timers, Enlarging Meters
http://www.darkroomautomation.com/index.htm
n o lindan at ix dot netcom dot com




 90 Posts in Topic:
Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-10 17:13:14 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Draco <JPDFDA@[EMAIL P  2007-10-10 12:24:08 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-10 19:47:49 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-10 20:10:33 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-12 15:34:24 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Dana Myers <dana.myers  2007-10-12 15:54:15 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Pieter" <pv  2007-10-13 05:27:26 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-12 16:53:23 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Jean-David Beyer <jean  2007-10-14 01:42:21 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Lloyd Erlick <Lloyd at  2007-10-14 07:18:02 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-14 10:15:31 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-16 14:37:56 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-13 12:16:46 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-10-13 19:40:10 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Pieter" <pv  2007-10-13 19:11:15 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-14 13:45:32 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-14 13:47:19 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Jean-David Beyer <jean  2007-10-14 22:43:59 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-15 13:19:10 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Jean-David Beyer <jean  2007-10-15 14:15:03 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Jean-David Beyer <jean  2007-10-15 14:26:46 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-15 11:14:21 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-16 14:50:32 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Dana Myers <dana.myers  2007-10-16 17:18:27 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-15 14:24:02 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-15 14:28:49 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommitteech  2007-10-15 15:30:36 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-15 11:53:07 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-16 22:11:36 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-10-17 05:41:01 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-17 13:32:17 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-17 15:25:07 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-17 14:37:20 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-17 15:14:01 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-17 15:08:20 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-17 17:57:58 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-17 18:01:03 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-17 22:54:22 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Keith Tapscott. <Keith  2007-10-23 19:58:14 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 brownt@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2007-10-26 07:04:13 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-28 09:40:25 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-10-29 01:23:05 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-29 11:06:21 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Jean-David Beyer <jdbe  2007-10-29 22:46:12 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-29 11:10:51 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-10-29 20:09:15 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-29 13:23:30 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-10-29 22:57:33 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-29 19:35:32 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-30 01:41:36 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-10-30 22:55:53 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-30 16:40:02 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-10-31 01:05:10 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-30 21:40:51 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-30 21:57:40 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-31 06:19:09 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-10-31 02:28:13 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-30 22:05:22 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-10-31 21:38:57 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-01 11:37:02 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-11-02 00:48:16 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "pico" <pico  2007-10-31 07:05:28 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 ____ <internetphobic@[  2007-12-31 20:13:46 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-30 17:10:11 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-30 17:14:33 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-30 22:10:28 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "pico" <pico  2007-10-31 07:10:33 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-31 07:56:34 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-31 07:58:54 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "pico" <pico  2007-10-31 20:43:51 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-10-31 15:01:32 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-11-01 00:00:53 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "pico" <pico  2007-10-31 20:49:00 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-11-01 02:36:15 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "pico" <pico  2007-11-01 07:35:35 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-01 11:45:57 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "pico" <pico  2007-11-01 19:57:08 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-01 08:57:43 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-11-01 16:50:00 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-01 08:59:35 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-01 09:01:49 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-01 09:33:56 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-01 10:48:42 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter <pirwin@[EMAIL P  2007-11-01 21:49:34 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-02 06:24:48 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-11-02 14:24:09 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 Peter Irwin <pirwin@[E  2007-11-06 01:32:57 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 "pico" <pico  2007-11-08 09:28:27 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-02 14:40:15 
Re: Improved T-Max 400
 UC <uraniumcommittee@[  2007-11-06 08:38:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 15:15:58 PST 2009.