Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Dark Rooms > Re: Dumb questi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 7 of 30 Topic 4005 of 4297
Post > Topic >>

Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5

by darkroommike <darkroommike@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oct 21, 2007 at 11:13 AM

Depends on the volume but for trials (at least) get a 8x10 
paper drum, one that has dividers to separate 4x5 sheets, 
load it in your changing bag (note you may need to invest in 
a larger bag) and process on the tabletop in room light.   i 
use a Unidrum and Uniroller for roll film and use an Omega 
Drum (Simmard) on the same base for the little sheet film I 
do.  I presoak and the Uniroller seems ideal since it 
reverses direction automatically.  The presoak extends 
processing times a bit but the constant agitation seems to 
shorten the processing times by about the same amount so I 
start with the "large tank" time and temperature and adjust 
if not satisfied with the contrast.

Much has been written on the concept, lots of Google hits 
and the old Jobo newsletter are a goldmine of rotary 
processing info using theirs or any other rotary equipment.

David Starr wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:27:00 -0400, "Robert Chin" <bchin_us@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> 
>> I'm sorry if this has been answered before.  This is a legit question
so 
>> please bear with me.
>>
>> My set up is not optimum.  I do not have a dedicated darkroom (for now
at 
>> least).  I've done many many rolls of film over the years.  I throw 
>> everyting into a changing bag, load up a reel and no problem.
>>
>> I'm getting ready to process 4x5 sheet film for the first time.  It
requires 
>> a bit more space to handle the sheet film than rolls.  Since I do not
have a 
>> dedicated darkroom, I can't fill the tanks with the necessary
chemicals, 
>> leave them on a tabletop, and just lift the film holder from tank to
tank in 
>> the dark.
>>
>> So my question(s) is/are simple:  I've heard that because the
processing 
>> tanks for 4x5 film take so long to fill, uneven development could
result. 
>> Is this a real problem, or is it the opinion of someone really
obsessive? 
>> Would I be better off making a light tight space to do this?
>>
>> Advice welcome from all.
>>
>> Thanks.
> Can you fill the developer tank in advance, and lower the film holder
into it in
> total darkness?  If so, that takes care of the filling.  Then, you can,
in the
> dark, take the top off the tank, dump the developer and pour in the stop
bath.  
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Retired Shop Rat: 14,647 days in a GM plant.
> Now I can do what I enjoy: Large Format Photography
> 
> Web Site: www.destarr.com
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 




 30 Posts in Topic:
Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Robert Chin" &  2007-10-20 12:27:00 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Jean-David Beyer <jean  2007-10-20 16:27:30 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Peter <p2macgahan@[EMA  2007-10-20 09:41:09 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-10-20 12:16:02 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2007-10-20 14:12:46 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Starr <davestarr  2007-10-20 17:46:44 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
darkroommike <darkroom  2007-10-21 11:13:42 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-21 14:42:09 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Jean-David Beyer <jdbe  2007-10-21 22:19:07 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Ken Hart" <  2007-10-21 20:19:06 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-21 21:52:48 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-22 06:13:10 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2007-10-21 20:09:39 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Mike ODonoghue <odonog  2007-10-22 06:47:18 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"pico" <pico  2007-10-28 20:11:48 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-10-29 01:20:33 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Ken Hart" <  2007-10-29 23:36:08 
Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2007-11-15 14:15:31 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-11-15 11:35:19 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2007-11-15 15:15:25 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-15 19:59:52 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-11-16 04:16:23 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-11-17 13:41:38 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
John <use_net@[EMAIL P  2007-12-29 21:42:50 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2008-01-02 09:21:47 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
John <use_net@[EMAIL P  2008-01-02 08:48:01 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-01-02 22:02:02 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"pico" <pico  2007-11-15 19:12:49 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
Bogdan Karasek <bkaras  2007-11-16 01:03:37 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
Bogdan Karasek <bkaras  2007-11-16 01:11:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 20:10:41 PST 2009.