On Oct 28, 9:23 pm, t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Thor Lancelot Simon) wrote:
> In article <1193589625.019232.237...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>
> UC <uraniumcommit...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >No, I test the materials I use.
>
> Do you? Because you referred to a H&D curve you had, pur****tedly,
> generated yourself, but then when I challenged you to post it, you said
> to look at the published Kodak curve (which does not appear to show
> anything like the effect you originally claimed). So. Let's see some
of
> this data from the testing you supposedly do of the materials you
supposedly
> use.
I never said I generated any H&D curve myself. The curve that Kodak
publishes sup****ts what I say about the film. If you don't understand
that, too bad. Tri-X shoulders off in teh highlight region. T-Max 400
does not. It's that simple. For outdoor work, a curve like that of Tri-
X is preferable.
>
> Oh, I forgot, you just like to hang around here and _talk_ about all the
> photography you do. One wouldn't expect less from a famous Usenet kook,
> I suppose.
Famous? Hardly.
>
> --
> Thor Lancelot Simon
t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is
to
> be abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam
Chomsky
|
