Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Dark Rooms > Re: a multi-way...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 3 Topic 4022 of 4297
Post > Topic >>

Re: a multi-wayer? WARNING for the non-thinkin man

by "HDAGHL" <dale.kelly@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 12, 2007 at 10:55 PM

"HDAGHL" <dale.kelly@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:uf-dnRoDuNzYVqXanZ2dnUVZ_hynnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Admin" <admin@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:8f042c665e76b2912868f7e2ed66689f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> In article <EZWdnWLQNdeLK6XanZ2dnUVZ_v2pnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> "HDAGHL" <dale.kelly@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> FOAD!
>>
>
> you can achieve the additivity with optics,
> lenses, etc., reccomendation
>
 




 3 Posts in Topic:
Re: a multi-wayer? WARNING for the non-thinkin man
"HDAGHL" <da  2007-11-12 21:23:42 
Re: a multi-wayer? WARNING for the non-thinkin man
"HDAGHL" <da  2007-11-12 22:53:47 
Re: a multi-wayer? WARNING for the non-thinkin man
"HDAGHL" <da  2007-11-12 22:55:57 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 20:23:10 PST 2009.