Talk About Network

Google





Photography > Dark Rooms > Re: Thanks to e...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 28 of 30 Topic 4005 of 4297
Post > Topic >>

Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...

by "pico" <pico@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 15, 2007 at 07:12 PM

"Robert Chin" <bchin_us@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fhi5ei02c93@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For now though I like the idea of a dilution that will allow me long 
> development times.  I'm using the Kodak Tmax film now.  Mostly the 100, 
> but in the future, I will be using the others.
>
> What is a good developer/dilution (preferably using Kodak or Ilford 
> chemistry) that will get me longer development times, like in the range
of 
> 10+ minutes?

D-76 diluted 1:1 at 68F will do well.  Ilford's ID-11 is the same. Choose 
one and be happy.

I gather you prefer longer times to avoid uneven development. Good idea.
If 
you are doing sheet film, I can recommend Rodinal 1:100 stand processing.
 




 30 Posts in Topic:
Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Robert Chin" &  2007-10-20 12:27:00 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Jean-David Beyer <jean  2007-10-20 16:27:30 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Peter <p2macgahan@[EMA  2007-10-20 09:41:09 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-10-20 12:16:02 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2007-10-20 14:12:46 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Starr <davestarr  2007-10-20 17:46:44 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
darkroommike <darkroom  2007-10-21 11:13:42 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-21 14:42:09 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Jean-David Beyer <jdbe  2007-10-21 22:19:07 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Ken Hart" <  2007-10-21 20:19:06 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2007-10-21 21:52:48 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2007-10-22 06:13:10 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2007-10-21 20:09:39 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
Mike ODonoghue <odonog  2007-10-22 06:47:18 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"pico" <pico  2007-10-28 20:11:48 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-10-29 01:20:33 
Re: Dumb question re: processing 4x5
"Ken Hart" <  2007-10-29 23:36:08 
Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2007-11-15 14:15:31 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-11-15 11:35:19 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2007-11-15 15:15:25 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Ken Hart" <  2007-11-15 19:59:52 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Lawrence Akutagawa&  2007-11-16 04:16:23 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2007-11-17 13:41:38 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
John <use_net@[EMAIL P  2007-12-29 21:42:50 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"Robert Chin" &  2008-01-02 09:21:47 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
John <use_net@[EMAIL P  2008-01-02 08:48:01 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-01-02 22:02:02 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
"pico" <pico  2007-11-15 19:12:49 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
Bogdan Karasek <bkaras  2007-11-16 01:03:37 
Re: Thanks to everyone...Follow up Question...
Bogdan Karasek <bkaras  2007-11-16 01:11:54 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Fri Jan 9 19:36:56 PST 2009.