Re: Another one bites the dust

At his point, it is hard to keep opened most of business based on 
photo-chemical processes so it is difficult to find suitable places to 
develop our "old" films and prints. Affortunately, we still have films 
and chemicals in order to work in our darkroom, the only place where I 
have got best results for my shots.

andrew m. boardman wrote:
> David Nebenzahl  <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> So that makes two (in this thread) so far. Maybe someone should compile

>> a list of current extant color printers ...
> 
> I'm amazed that it sounds like there's more than a very small handful,
as
> I'd thought it was basically a dead business!  Though for an established
> lab that's processing RA4 anyway, keeping an enlarger with a color head
> around for the oddballs who want it isn't much of an investment.
> 
> It's basically just morbid curiousity on my part, though; if I care
> enough to want to do a direct enlarger print instead of scan+digiprint,
I
> care enough to print it myself.