On Feb 21, 7:16 am, dan.c.qu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Feb 19, 10:01 pm, Steven Woody wrote:
>
>
>
> > I interested in single-tray because,
>
> > 1, My room is not large, even thougth it's capable use
> > three trays, use one tray only is attractive to me;
>
> Single tray processing is a great space saver. I would
> need six trays to duplicate the results I obtain with one tray.
> And that is just basic high quality processing. Conventional
> six tray processing includes a developer, stop bath, fixer 1,
> fixer 2, rinse, and hypo clear. I can do that with One tray
> and need only two of the above six steps; develope -
> fix. Both are Very dilute and used only once.
Dan,
1, What's the dillution you used for develo**** and fixer?
2, What is your workflow? ( i.e. how many fixing, how many rinses, I
mean how you do the one-tray thing step by step )
> The little processing needed is done conveniently using
> One-shot very dilute chemistry. I believe that is where Mr.
> Nebenzahl fails to connect; One-Tray + One Shot chemistry.
> There is No reason to use more than One tray if the Chemistry
> is used One-Shot. I'm sure David is familiar with the rotary
> process and the fact that some who do use One Tube
> also use One-Shot chemistry. Dan
|
