Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Dark Rooms > Re: AN (Anti-Ne...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 16 Topic 4088 of 4227
Post > Topic >>

Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question

by tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thor Lancelot Simon) Mar 20, 2008 at 04:39 PM

In article <internetphobic-293A06.22372719032008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
____  <internetphobic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>Ok for you, I just pulled my Omega 10x10 carrier out of the enlarger 
>and it has two sheets of standard optical glass but not AN. To my 
>knowledge AN appears with a Matte surface unlike standard optical grade 
>glass. It (AN) will look less than perfectly clear. Imop & Perhaps 
>Richard K. can corroborate AN is only needed with a Condenser housing, I 
>have an Omega diffused Halogen one of three known to exist.

No.  Under some conditions -- atmospheric and of the negative -- you'll
see Newton rings with this glass carrier.  I know because I have one.

To make one of my negatives printable I had to replace the top glass in
my 10x10 Omega carrier with AN glass and the bottom glass with a piece
of anti-reflective coated glass from a frame shop.  With that done, the
problem was considerably lessened, though not eliminated entirely.

The best solution is a tension carrier like the pin-register carriers
Fotar used to make for their enlargers -- actually the only 8x10"
tension carriers I've ever seen.  In 4x5" the Beseler Negaflat, of
course, was fairly common.

-- 
  Thor Lancelot Simon	                                    
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to
   be abandoned or transcended, there is no problem."	      - Noam Chomsky
 




 16 Posts in Topic:
AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
<jjs>   2008-03-16 16:09:56 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-03-16 17:56:12 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
"Ken Hart" <  2008-03-16 19:51:02 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
gr <greif1nospam@[EMAI  2008-03-16 21:13:44 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
Draco <JPDFDA@[EMAIL P  2008-03-19 13:54:44 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-03-19 14:27:43 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2008-03-19 17:35:19 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
<jjs>   2008-03-19 20:53:06 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-03-19 22:37:28 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2008-03-20 06:13:12 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
<jjs>   2008-03-20 08:41:35 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-03-20 16:39:51 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-03-20 19:24:04 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
tls@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (T  2008-03-21 16:42:36 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
"Richard Knoppow&quo  2008-03-20 05:21:15 
Re: AN (Anti-Newton) glass question
____ <internetphobic@[  2008-03-19 22:44:39 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 20 3:38:54 CDT 2008.