Re: Wet photography is really dying

In article <48275c59$0$11167$822641b3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, David 
Nebenzahl 
nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...

> You know, it's great you have all that stuff; it really is. I don't mean

> to take anything away from that. But how on earth can you propose that 
> since *you* have all this great stuff that the state of wet photography 
> is OK? It is for you, for the moment, but as others have pointed out, 
> what happens when manufacturers inevitably start not producing film and 
> paper? What will we do then?
> 
Wet plates.  :-)