In article <MPG.2291803df6eea91298b7d7@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
Rob Morley <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <48275c59$0$11167$822641b3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, David
> Nebenzahl
> nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> > You know, it's great you have all that stuff; it really is. I don't
mean
> > to take anything away from that. But how on earth can you propose that
> > since *you* have all this great stuff that the state of wet
photography
> > is OK? It is for you, for the moment, but as others have pointed out,
> > what happens when manufacturers inevitably start not producing film
and
> > paper? What will we do then?
> >
> Wet plates. :-)
And dry plates, and homemade paper. But there are too many film cameras
in use for film to disappear anytime soon, if ever. Even rollfilm sizes
like 620 and 127 are still available.
--
Charles Hohenstein (to reply, remove Gene Robinson)
"The sad huddle of affluent bedwetters, thumbsuckers,
treehuggers, social climbers, homophiles, quavery ladies,
and chronic petition signers that makes up the current
Episcopal Church . . ." ---Thomas Lipscomb
|
