In article <i-ednb4StersFbrVnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
"Pico" <pico at idrailogid.ten> wrote:
> "David Nebenzahl" <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:48275c59$0$11167$822641b3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > You know, it's great you have all that stuff; it really is. I don't
mean
> > to take anything away from that. But how on earth can you propose that
> > since *you* have all this great stuff that the state of wet
photography is
> > OK? It is for you, for the moment, but as others have pointed out,
what
> > happens when manufacturers inevitably start not producing film and
paper?
> > What will we do then?
>
> I believe there will always be film and paper, however I am afraid it
will
> be terribly expensive.
>
> One thing that really bothers me is the Rollei film marketing -
overpriced
> and it comes in its own cute little wooden coffin.
I'm always curious what people are doing with the Rollei stuff. I've
never felt the urge to try it (largely because of the price), but I'd
like to know what people are doing with it and why they like it.
--
Charles Hohenstein (to reply, remove Gene Robinson)
"The sad huddle of affluent bedwetters, thumbsuckers,
treehuggers, social climbers, homophiles, quavery ladies,
and chronic petition signers that makes up the current
Episcopal Church . . ." -‹Thomas Lipscomb
|
