Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Photography > Dark Rooms > Re: Wet photogr...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 15 of 20 Topic 4159 of 4227
Post > Topic >>

Re: Wet photography is really dying

by Rob Morley <nospam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 02:58 AM

In article <chohensteGeneRobinson-55996A.19222911052008
@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Charles Hohenstein 
chohensteGeneRobinson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...

> And dry plates, and homemade paper. But there are too many film cameras 
> in use for film to disappear anytime soon, if ever. Even rollfilm sizes 
> like 620 and 127 are still available.
> 
620 is just respooled 120, you can slit and respool 120 to make 127, so 
those formats can continue as long as rollfilm is available and people 
can be bothered to mess around with it.  I was surprised to note that 
apparently even 110 and 126 are still commercially available - these 
aren't so easy to DIY because of the registration holes.
 




 20 Posts in Topic:
Wet photography is really dying
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-05-08 18:36:50 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Ken Hart" <  2008-05-09 03:16:58 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-05-08 20:33:31 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Pico" <pico  2008-05-09 07:37:08 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Nicholas O. Lindan&  2008-05-09 09:28:53 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Pico" <pico  2008-05-09 10:54:31 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Pico" <pico  2008-05-09 07:35:49 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Ken Nadvornick"  2008-05-09 21:29:15 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Pico" <pico  2008-05-10 08:00:03 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
Jean-David Beyer <jean  2008-05-10 13:08:18 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-05-11 13:53:00 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-05-11 23:15:15 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
Charles Hohenstein <ch  2008-05-11 19:22:29 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
David Nebenzahl <nobod  2008-05-11 17:04:03 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
Rob Morley <nospam@[EM  2008-05-12 02:58:58 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Pico" <pico  2008-05-11 18:59:45 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
Charles Hohenstein <ch  2008-05-11 21:16:22 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
"Pico" <pico  2008-05-12 11:51:42 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
dan.c.quinn@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-10 17:06:21 
Re: Wet photography is really dying
Jean-David Beyer <jean  2008-05-11 11:35:08 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 20 5:18:52 CDT 2008.